I like this thread only because it will trigger a couple faggots.

Oh yeah? You wanna get my dick hard, sailor?

I hate Republicans and Trump but if you don't agree, no matter who you are, that Trump is the funniest thing that ever happened, you're a goddamned blithering idiot.

I didn't vote Trump and his gun-grabbing is despicable but I'll vote him 2020 just to spite people I hate

I didn’t either but I might do the same for the same reason.

He has my vote because he grabs married women by their pussies and I've never heard of something so manly and incredible.

Gun grabbing?

Agreed

He's not a Republican, he's a 3rd party populist who ran on the ticket and destroyed both the Bush and Clinton political dynasties...and for that he deserves all 4 heads on Mt Rushmore

*Mt.Trump

Every criticism of him ends that way

I didn't want Trump but it was all worth it to see the destruction of "Jeb!"

That was the political humiliation of a lifetime

Agreed.

This man stay got a nigga’s rib hurtin’ wit his mouth.

in a world where only aryan males are allowed to speak in public nevermind hold office, i would laugh at this big ridiculous lump

but in the jewish hippie nigger loving bullshit world we live in hes the only thing holding society together

Shut up old guy or I will hit you upon the lips and gums

i tell people to shut up you dont tell people to shut up

I love him only because of Patrick.

I admire the way that he's reframed the Mueller investigation as being about "Collusion" and "Obstruction" rather than an "Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election", which is what it was literally called. Mueller wasn't looking into whether Trump had colluded with Russians - which is not technically a crime, or Don Jnr. would be in jail for that Trump Tower meeting - but naturally the media went along with Trump's framing, and now everyone's pissed off that they were promised one thing and sold another.

I admire the way that he's reframed the Mueller investigation as being about "Collusion" and "Obstruction" rather than an "Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election",

Part of the official remit of the investigation in relation to that 'interference' was literally an investigation into possible collusion/conspiracy and Obstruction which was the important part and what every single lunatic who believed that wacks conspiracy theory had been saying would be proved 'any day now'. It's not an either or.

He's totally right to point out how ludicrous and unproven those things are.

Part of the official remit of the investigation in relation to that 'interference' was literally an investigation into possible collusion/conspiracy...

Can you point to that section in the official remit?

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3726372-Order-3915-2017-Special-Counsel.html

I'll take that as a "no", then.

I know they were only investigating potential 'coordination' between the Trump campaign and the Russian state which in no way is synonymous with collusion. Just like they weren't 'spying' on the Trump campaign they just secretly infiltrated it to gather information.

We must be precise with terms.

These types of tedious, semantic splitting of hairs

I'm not splitting hairs. You made a testable statement of fact ("Part of the official remit of the investigation") and yet you can't point to any evidence for it, and get annoyed when asked.

That kind of "feels over reals" nonsense is what the Left gets accused of all the time; don't be one of them.

I'm not splitting hairs.

Well what would you call somehow thinking there's some difference in investigating 'coordination' vs 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and Russia? What, in your mind, is the significant difference between those two terms?

Just more feelings; I'm sorry I triggered you.

Have some chocolate and a cry, and maybe when you're feeling you can quote some sources to support your arguments.

Winner, winner, Sheeeeeen chicken dinner....