Amazon is not Goodreads, child. It is a different environment entirely. One where authors are encouraged to interact with their readers more directly. Which is why it's not at all unusual for authors on Amazon to shamelessly plug their other work in the review section of another book as a jumping off point for further conversations. Indeed, that's why they have a feature that specifically allows any faggot to comment on a review of their own work as such if they're pathetic enough to do so. Not all authors are desperate enough to take advantage of this feature, but a few are and no one in the community considers it unethical.
All of which you would know if you were being serious and honest in your questions. But you're not, because you're just another trolling shit mitten. Which is why you're irrelevant and impotent.
He wasn't paid an advance for this book, he had to pay them to print copies. Sort of like a shitty pyramid scheme. He buys the first 1000 copies before he makes any money.
I don’t think so, I don’t think he’s vanity publishing. I mean if that’s true, then that’s probably the most embarrassing thing anyone has ever said about him on any forum ever. If he is self publishing or vanity publishing that’s worse than anything we’ve ever said to him or about him. Seriously, that’s mega mega embarrassing. I want that to be true so bad. Do you have a source?
Why would this anonymous, non-verified reviewer mention the one star posts? No one gives a shit about some anonymous author they’ve never met and his one star reviews. How transparent is this fat tub of lard?
10 comments
1 fourStrokes1900 2019-05-19
He really is pathetic
1 stealthygeek 2019-05-19
Amazon is not Goodreads, child. It is a different environment entirely. One where authors are encouraged to interact with their readers more directly. Which is why it's not at all unusual for authors on Amazon to shamelessly plug their other work in the review section of another book as a jumping off point for further conversations. Indeed, that's why they have a feature that specifically allows any faggot to comment on a review of their own work as such if they're pathetic enough to do so. Not all authors are desperate enough to take advantage of this feature, but a few are and no one in the community considers it unethical.
All of which you would know if you were being serious and honest in your questions. But you're not, because you're just another trolling shit mitten. Which is why you're irrelevant and impotent.
1 peckaface 2019-05-19
I notice that's not a verified purchase
1 ladedamrfrenchman 2019-05-19
I left a good review for a James Patterson book and he personally came to my house to shake my hand so I believe this encounter is also genuine
1 GeMigMat 2019-05-19
Anonymous huh?
1 FlatlipsTLumpyson 2019-05-19
He wasn't paid an advance for this book, he had to pay them to print copies. Sort of like a shitty pyramid scheme. He buys the first 1000 copies before he makes any money.
1 fourStrokes1900 2019-05-19
six figures... gotta spend money to pretend to make money
1 CommodorePawsey 2019-05-19
I don’t think so, I don’t think he’s vanity publishing. I mean if that’s true, then that’s probably the most embarrassing thing anyone has ever said about him on any forum ever. If he is self publishing or vanity publishing that’s worse than anything we’ve ever said to him or about him. Seriously, that’s mega mega embarrassing. I want that to be true so bad. Do you have a source?
1 CommodorePawsey 2019-05-19
Why would this anonymous, non-verified reviewer mention the one star posts? No one gives a shit about some anonymous author they’ve never met and his one star reviews. How transparent is this fat tub of lard?
1 Pavoneo_ 2019-05-19
Faggot used his referral link too 😂