So I suppose this means Moo Hefner didn't take Frunkis' legal manifesto seriously?

56  2019-08-27 by HummingbirdPate

For 2 seconds I almost thought that was the last we'd hear from the 🐮

13 comments

1  TaumpyTearsxyz 2019-08-27

That’s the thing about Cumia’s. They always double down when they should be backing down.

Just like his manlet brother, James will never learn.

1  of_lower_stock 2019-08-27

Their father was a family-abandoning petty criminal scumbag, so... it all makes a lot of sense.

1  MelGibsonBot_ 2019-08-27

You’re fucking gouging me.

1  notasodomite 2019-08-27

Good bot

1  Single_Action_Army 2019-08-27

I'm hoping it was serious and that faggot wasn't just pulling our prick.

1  eatshitfaggotlmfao 2019-08-27

Frunkis is a bloviating faggot, so are any of you who think anyone is going to go after false dmca claims in litigation.

1  TaumpyTearsxyz 2019-08-27

Why don’t you help yourself to a can of CHINGA TU MADRE, instead?

1  JamesHefnerXYZ 2019-08-27

Nope.

1  PeterandJanBrady 2019-08-27

Do I smell another People's Court episode on its way James???

1  joemoomia 2019-08-27

He grazed it briefly.

1  Every1ShouldBKilled 2019-08-27

I DM’d Frunkis.

There’s no doubt that Joe got spooked, but took it out on the sub in the form of boneheaded aggression.

If Frunkis has the balls and know-how, he’s gotta act. NOW.

1  BrainPainter 2019-08-27

Did anyone save a back up? What did I miss?

1  ilumty 2019-08-27

"If the party you sent the takedown notice to decided to pursue this in court, you could face all of the consequences that your state imposes on people who lie in court. "

source - https://www.newmediarights.org/business_models/artist/what_are_penalties_false_copyright_infringement_claims

legit all it takes is one person who doesn't care about their DOX taking Joe to court