Snoway!

Not sure why Harambe is upset about Ghostbusters

Thank God is a proper sequel and annoying that terrible one with the unfunny women.

This aint a proper sequel either. Jason Reitman is awful and one of the worst examples of nepotism in Hollywood history. Egon is dead, Ray is fatter than the character even was in the cartoon, Bill Murray probably wont do it. This movie should’ve been made 20 years ago, it’s too late. Ghostbusters 2 was punishment enough.

it's a new teenager cast. Jason Reitman is not bad.

Yes he is, he sucks. He's a boring, guileless, overrated fuck head.

I like movies like Up in the Air, young adult and Juno. They are original movies. I don't think about them often but they are not bad at all. Would you describe what you don't like about him?

Yes. His movies are trite "character" studies that focus on ultimately boring and inconsequential characters. Nothing about his movies stand out, or show any sort of stylistic touches that exemplify them as "Jason Reitman" movies. It's this weird 'faux indie' charade, and he has about as much artistic impact as Ron Howard. Anything of his I've ever seen, I was checking my watch 40 minutes in, and forgot I'd even seen it by the time I threw my popcorn in the garbage on the way out of the theater.

Ivan Reitman is a genius, Jason Reitman tinkers with story ideas as a hobby.

Juno was interesting and well shot. It was mostly interesting for the script. I don't share your hatred and i'm not sure I understand it. I think he's competent

Exactly. He's "competent." Exactly what I hope for out of a director and a Ghostbusters movie, "competency."

Juno was not interesting, and you're a fag.

I'm not too concerned with the ghostbusters movie. I also don't have any loyalty to the director. Juno created buzz. It was written by a stripper who wrote it in a target starbucks in Minnesota. I always thought that was interesting. I don't really like the dialogue stuff that much but it definitely hit an audience. you seem like a nice guy.

(Im just giving you a hard time, settle down, fella.)

Jason Reitman is Ron Howard, but he wants to be Alexander Payne. That's the way I see it.

I don't care if it's Tarantino making it, I really would rather not have a Ghostbusters 3. Especially without Harold Ramis.

you seem like a nice guy

Nice guy? I don't give a shit. Good father? FUCK YOU, GO HOME AND PLAY WITH YOUR KIDS.

what on earth on you on about?

I'd argue that he'd probably try to honor his father's wishes for the new film, while also listening to Sony's demands. But this time around it might be in the Reitman's favor, since Sony's move fucked the franchise up the first time.

It probably wont be great, but have some funny parts in it; like the majority of GB 2

The whole first act of Ghostbusters II is great. The movie basically ends/is no longer its own entity after that courtroom battle. From then on, its just a sad rehash of Ghostbusters, with a central villain so boring and corny they might as well have fought the Sandman from the cartoon.

I worshipped Ghostbusters growing up, having a Ghostbusters movie with no Egon is so fraudulent and gross it makes my asshole pucker. I wish they'd just leave it be.

I get why Sony needs to make the money back, and as a business you can't be so arrogant as to consistently blame the trolls for the GB 2016 failure; you need to right the ship and make the money back that you lost. Unfortunately; going woke will cause you to go broke, every time (unless your property was already woke to begin with). GB 2 still had great performers in a weak script, so the charm was still there, but nobody wants that again. And who knows; GB 3 could turn out to just be woke garbage. I'll at least enjoy the ruffled feathers of feminists, until Reitman puts out a statement that placates their feelings.

They blame the trolls because it's convenient and a good cover; it's a lot more business savvy to say than "our movie was a piece of shit that no one liked, on any level." In those leaked Sony emails, half way through production Kristin Wiig begged her agent to get her off the movie because she was sure it was going to be a colossal failure and waste of her time.

Those emails are a laugh riot all around. Trying to sue Bill Murray for not wanting to be involved with the project? Nigga who is you?

But they gotta right the ship. They wont come out and blame the film, they'll just quietly fix everything with the 3rd film. Or they wont.

[removed]

Holy shit what a stupid illiterate cunt. I had to read that three times, how the fuck is someone this stupid "famous"?

Chris Rock shamed Lorne into hiring her.

10 minutes after his divorce was finalized.

Not that that had any effect on the way Rock views black women.

Red Letter Media destroying that movie was hilarious.

REMEMBER SCARFACE?!?!?!?!?!

​

"Stop dancing"

Lifelike avatar, Dogg. Girl power.

That avatar is a crime.

“I re-read my tweet... I was afraid I said something bad...” What a faggot.

I'm not even excited about another Ghostbusters but I'm excited that it's pissing these people off.

Hahaha, this is fucking great.

If I lost my company millions of dollars , I'd be fired. But nah, you can make a shitty move and catch feelings when they don't want you to be part of another shitty movie.

Is English her first language?

No, sign language was. This is a new breakthrough.

Amy wants banana. (Can anyone guess the reference)

Leslie good gorilla, Leslie pretty!

Shitting in her hand and throwing it at people is her first language.

Make Ghostbusters great again

[removed]

That woman has to have an IQ of 75 or less. Her Twitter feed is nothing but banal observations of life overhyped by her shock at the smallest shit. She has the brains of a goldfish. Everything is a surprise that warrants her "DAMN! Let me tell you, honey" nattering. She's a goddamn retard.

Nice thin girl Twitter picture, stupid.

I hate living in an infantile country where grown men and women will spend 45 minutes having genuinely heated debates about a fake movie that follows a team of wacky ghost catchers.

Nuke our shit already god damn.

[removed]

So this pig makes a shitty reboot of a beloved film which takes a dump on the originals, even brings back some of the original actors but deliberately in different roles, barely scripts anything and instead relies on bad improv, thinks it can bank on the idea of replacing the leads as women, trashes the fan base for criticizing their awful trailer and terrible film, the movie bombs and costs the studios millions, and she thinks the son of the director of the original picking things up where his father left off and paying respect to the original by including the OG leads in their proper roles, is somehow shitting on her abortion of a movie? What an egotistical bum.

Yeah, Leslie, when your movie doesn't make enough money and isn't well-reviewed by critics and isn't popular with fans, you don't get a sequel.

TL;DR backstory: So Akroyd and Ivan Reitman were trying to get Ghostbusters 3 to happen for some time. When Amy Pascal and Sony decided to go the way they went; what they obviously didn't count on were the leaked Sony emails from the North Korea hack, that made it's way to the public. What they revealed was that Pascal basically pulled power move after power move, blocking Akroyd and Reitman from even participating, and moreso just taking it out right from under them.

Now it doesn't matter that Pascal is a woman (although all women should be thrown off a cliff like Troys gf); what does matter here is that she's a fucking hack, that had a hack vision for this stupid franchise. Sony owned it and was just sitting on it waiting for Akroyd and Reitman to get the project together, but she went around them because Sony basically said; "If you can get this together first, you can have it", instead of bothering to keep waiting for Reitman and Akroyd (who, to be fair, couldn't get it together for years and couldn't get stupid Murray to agree to do it).

The now-famous bit of all this is Sony threatening to pursue legal intervention against Murray, if he kept refusing to do the movie and MORE legal action if he refused to promote it (https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704). On top of this; Akroyd and Reitman were largely unhappy with the film, had asked for changes to be made, and were told to kick rocks and beat it by Paul Fag. However; Fag went over budget anyway with his reshoots, which they didn't recoup at the box office (THE MOVIE BOMBED, FELLAS). They were hoping the GB universe would kick off after all this Marvel-style, but the film and merch did so poorly, that they had to just tuck and roll out of their plans.

Sony pictures is now desperate to recoup money and actually MAKE money off of Ghostbusters, so much so that they're willing to take on Reitman and Akroyd's film adaptation again. Good old Ernie Hudson didn't want the broads mucking up the works the first time, so he's back. And who the fuck knows how they got Murray back and why (Red Letter Media places the blame of GB 2016 squarely at the feet of Murray, who held out like a big-time puss for years). But with Reitman's son and the surviving cast back together; Sony is banking on a success because they NEED it, even if they have to do a reverse-woke job on it.

If you're like me; you're hoping Moranis gets jazzed up about this enough to come out of retirement.

TL;DR: Paul Fag is a funny thing to call someone named Paul Feig.

My favorite is that clip of Akroyd tearing the film apart and calling Feig a hack.

https://youtu.be/rc1nD8QLpcE?t=49

[removed]

I like how he didn’t get praised after his first tweet so he had to tell her again that he was indeed a good person. I don’t throw this word around lightly but what a true definition of a baby boy.

Women are funny

wtf, you can't just replace the cast from the previous movie with the opposite sex and act like it never happened?!

She gets upset it's not acknowledging that 2016 shit when that is exactly what the 2016 ghostbusters did to the originals.

Also: Nathan Martin is a faggot.

Can she even speak and spell correctly?