is the singer purposely starting every line half a beat off for Sunday Bloody Sunday? and his voice sucks. they clearly tried using auto-tune on his voice for Beautiful Day and it's still incredibly off-pitch. jesus.
lol i appreciate the editor put in the effort to overlay the stock crowd footage on top of their feature video; Just in case we might actually think their from the same source anything, an indirect split-screen is utilized to highlight the visual discrepancies in resolution, lighting, compression, scaling ..
And the aesthetic approach to illustrate the band's longevity by editing everything with the retro camera codec setting of 60interlaced-fps .. OR...
Did they just import drag-n-drop the legacy footage First into the new project-timeline and totally ignore the software's Create and Change Sequences prompt: "Do you want to conform the (entire) sequence settings to match this (clunky old pre-2009 SD) clip?"
From an editors standpoint, this is horrible. At least pan from the concert to show the live audience. Horrible audio transitions. And Joe, you aren't making a living out of a U2 Cover band, you're making a living leeching off your brother, faggot.
A U2 Cover band is gayer than gay. U2 is already insufferable and managed to trick themselves onto every new iphone in the country. You're in a cover band because you suck to bad to write lyrics and you're a card carrying white supremacist.
11 comments
1 emerge_from_the_mist 2018-12-14
Those stock crowd shots are awful
1 tranthasourus 2018-12-14
Joe lives in the land of make believe
1 1qw1qw1 2018-12-14
is the singer purposely starting every line half a beat off for Sunday Bloody Sunday? and his voice sucks. they clearly tried using auto-tune on his voice for Beautiful Day and it's still incredibly off-pitch. jesus.
how has U2 not sued these idiots?
1 EastSideDan 2018-12-14
Joe looks just like The Edge. If he has 260 pounds and a ham fisted 60 year old.
1 OlShotgunFace 2018-12-14
The Pudge
1 OlShotgunFace 2018-12-14
U2? More like #MeToo after that ear rape!
1 FAGGOT-FAGGOT 2018-12-14
I’m left speechless at how embarrassing this is.
1 BoomBoomorYumYum 2018-12-14
Pretty crowded Applebee's .
1 BrundellFly 2018-12-14
lol i appreciate the editor put in the effort to overlay the stock crowd footage on top of their feature video; Just in case we might actually think their from the same
sourceanything, an indirect split-screen is utilized to highlight the visual discrepancies in resolution, lighting, compression, scaling ..He Did His Job Wel!
1 BrundellFly 2018-12-14
And the aesthetic approach to illustrate the band's longevity by editing everything with the retro camera codec setting of 60interlaced-fps .. OR...
Did they just
importdrag-n-drop the legacy footage First into the new project-timeline and totally ignore the software's Create and Change Sequences prompt: "Do you want to conform the (entire) sequence settings to match this (clunky old pre-2009 SD) clip?"1 dalgriff 2018-12-14
From an editors standpoint, this is horrible. At least pan from the concert to show the live audience. Horrible audio transitions. And Joe, you aren't making a living out of a U2 Cover band, you're making a living leeching off your brother, faggot.
A U2 Cover band is gayer than gay. U2 is already insufferable and managed to trick themselves onto every new iphone in the country. You're in a cover band because you suck to bad to write lyrics and you're a card carrying white supremacist.