For recording, these men entered a private residence have no expectation of privacy, especially since they were there to commit a crime.
For broadcast, they may feel confident broadcasting it because it falls into a category of content that is legal because it is newsworthy. If it ever went to court some might even argue it's a public service.
Now, on some they were also filmed being arrested and talking to the officers inside a mobile arrest and processing station. I have a feeling that might be of concern but I have no idea.
7 comments
1 TheDirtyWolfman 2018-05-23
YOU EVER SUCK A MANS COCK? SUCK THAT COCK!
1 LarryKleist711 2018-05-23
I don't understand why any of those retards allowed them to film their faces. You have to sign a waiver. Fucking morons.
1 TurningFrogsGay 2018-05-23
I think it’s evidence. I may be wrong, but the blurred faces on COPS were people accused but not yet convicted.
1 StuntPeckah 2018-05-23
For recording, these men entered a private residence have no expectation of privacy, especially since they were there to commit a crime.
For broadcast, they may feel confident broadcasting it because it falls into a category of content that is legal because it is newsworthy. If it ever went to court some might even argue it's a public service.
Now, on some they were also filmed being arrested and talking to the officers inside a mobile arrest and processing station. I have a feeling that might be of concern but I have no idea.
1 hSUitMSi 2018-05-23
Hanson
1 dackots 2018-05-23
Is this the same clip that Anthony said he'd fuck a 13-year-old?
1 satanssockpuppet 2018-05-23
This clip is actually pretty fucking funny.
1 Bars_Ulrich 2018-05-23
He uses the screenname DougBenstoned420