Still, mainstream movies that keep having theatrical releases year after year, but those are made by a black man, so they don't count. It's only social progress if white people make a black movie.
It is fucking crazy that they can have a major super hero named after the most visibly racist militant black organization in American history and no one mentions it. It's like if Marvel put out a movie called Klansman.
Still, mainstream movies that keep having theatrical releases year after year, but those are made by a black man, so they don't count. It's only social progress if white people make a black movie.
11 comments
1 DigitalTorque 2018-02-07
...was hailed by the Daily Beast as "a love letter to every black person" and "a correction for years of diversity neglect" by Rolling Stone.
Excuse me, but did we forget about Soul Plane?
1 FoetusCorruptus 2018-02-07
...from white people. I'l let Tyler Perry know all his movies were meaningless. This is apparently the first black movie.
1 DigitalTorque 2018-02-07
i mean, technically speaking, Tyler Perry movies are worthless
1 FoetusCorruptus 2018-02-07
Still, mainstream movies that keep having theatrical releases year after year, but those are made by a black man, so they don't count. It's only social progress if white people make a black movie.
1 GothamJustice 2018-02-07
I was going to say Car Wash and Big Momma’s House 2
1 AlvinItchyCock 2018-02-07
Poor Luke Cage didnt get any love probably because he fucked white chicks.
1 Belchides 2018-02-07
sweet christmas
1 FoetusCorruptus 2018-02-07
It's a fucking comic book movie. No comic book movie deserves a 100% rating, the pandering isn't even being disguised anymore, it's just blatant now.
1 OsloJimmy 2018-02-07
Absent criticism, everything is perfect.
1 Phkna1 2018-02-07
The best part is that the African superhero was created by 2 white guys back in the 60s.
1 pastorpotluck 2018-02-07
It is fucking crazy that they can have a major super hero named after the most visibly racist militant black organization in American history and no one mentions it. It's like if Marvel put out a movie called Klansman.
1 heslaotian 2018-02-07
Well I mean it's the name of the comic book the movie is based on so everything you just said is wrong.
1 heslaotian 2018-02-07
It's really not anything like that.
1 pastorpotluck 2018-02-07
Explain how it's different then.
1 TARE_ME 2018-02-07
The the character was in development since '65, made first appearance in July '66.
Black Panther Party started in at the end of '66.
Marvel actually changed the character's name for a while so people would t get them confused, then changed it back like 15 years later.
1 pastorpotluck 2018-02-07
Thank you for this information. Though my parallels don't add up, I still find the overall vibe disconcerting.
1 FoetusCorruptus 2018-02-07
Still, mainstream movies that keep having theatrical releases year after year, but those are made by a black man, so they don't count. It's only social progress if white people make a black movie.