Dunkirk is fucking terrible
0 2018-01-12 by boring_oneliner
Faggy brits running away. Nolan totally butchered the scale of the operation. Lack of Action or story masked by making effects too loud. Fite me irl
0 2018-01-12 by boring_oneliner
Faggy brits running away. Nolan totally butchered the scale of the operation. Lack of Action or story masked by making effects too loud. Fite me irl
27 comments
6 terpin 2018-01-12
It's no Face/Off, I'll give you that.
2 FoetusCorruptus 2018-01-12
I can't even hear the term "face off" without obsessively saying outloud "I want to take his face.... off". Complete with hand gesture.
1 terpin 2018-01-12
Patrice ruined that goddamn movie for me, motherfucker.
1 JerkStoreJ 2018-01-12
You’re an idiot if you didn’t think that was a shit movies my before Patrice.
1 terpin 2018-01-12
I did not and never have claimed to be any sort of auteur, sir.
2 could-too2 2018-01-12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIYq8CXUjdc
1 terpin 2018-01-12
Goddammit 12 year old me enjoyed the shit out of this movie and I refuse to apologize for it.
1 Toughcrowdd 2018-01-12
Believe it was Norton and Patriki agreed
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2018-01-12
Wanna feel old?
That movie is 20 years old last year.
His sexy slut daughter is nearly 40yo now.
Oh my god that scene in her little panties.
And she played Lolita too.
😍
1 Zazz_Lacker 2018-01-12
So your "I'm going to play a gay character for 2018" thing lasted...13 days?
You sound like me trying to stop drinking.
1 smallDick-Mailman 2018-01-12
Peach... I could eat a peach for hours
2 OsloJimmy 2018-01-12
complete lack of tactical dispersion
2 Horst-Wessel-Lied 2018-01-12
This Churchill movie has to be a hoot also
1 gregorio_ilidivich 2018-01-12
I'll reiterate what I said previously. A film about the events surrounding Operation Barbarossa would be infinitely more interesting, though doing so would paint the Russians in a favorable light, thus creating ambiguity regarding the "evil Russians." It's all around pathetic.
1 grocery_man 2018-01-12
Nah the russians are boring.
1 [deleted] 2018-01-12
[deleted]
1 Pogo_Thee_Clown 2018-01-12
Wasn't Dunkirk about when a completely exhausted,equipment lacking maintenance,under supplied German army pushed its way from Germany to Dunkirk to face rested,well supplied,ready for battle British army and pushed them into the sea along with capturing their supplies and equipment?
1 Dennyislife 2018-01-12
Its a terrible film. The story of Dunkirk is ordinary people risking it all to bring people home. Movie falls to get that across really. I say that as someone who had family on the Dunkirk beaches.
1 A_Friendly_Creeper 2018-01-12
If only a mortar landed on them.
1 A_Friendly_Creeper 2018-01-12
If only a mortar landed on them. You're doing them proud, posting on this faggot site.
2 Dennyislife 2018-01-12
Not a direct line. My direct line were locked up in prison during the war #forzaitalia
1 grocery_man 2018-01-12
How does it fail to get that across? One of the story lines is the ordinary people on their boat saving soldiers.
1 boring_oneliner 2018-01-12
Yeah, a whole of 7 seven small yachts rescue a total of 49 guys. That's totally what happened.
1 Dennyislife 2018-01-12
Its literally the only reason the name Dunkirk still resonates. The film just had it as a side storyline and focused on one boat.
I think I fell asleep watching it.
1 grocery_man 2018-01-12
Lack of action hahaha. You are a moron.
1 Toughcrowdd 2018-01-12
Its really not worth watching?
1 boring_oneliner 2018-01-12
I think it's completely forgettable.
1 Toughcrowdd 2018-01-12
Striked me as such.
0 UnwarrantedArrogance 2018-01-12
It’s incredibly stupid how they didn’t include ANY soldiers who were women of color.