You guys stop clowning around this shit is serious business.

484  2017-11-22 by CspiceLeReddit

38 comments

Richard Vos is a national treasure that must be protected.

Like, fucking CORPORATIONS want to charge you like, more MONEY to watch Rich Vos clips that could be like, considered controversial?

Faggoty reddity comment

EERgiNt: yuR INtur net iS.. in nootrUL

Well that's good, Ed. I'm glad a resource as important as the net is neutral in control.

AHPREL FAHHHLLZZZ

Congratulations! Your post reached top five in /r/all/rising. The post was thus x-posted to /r/masub.

It had 49 points in 49 minutes when the x-post was made.

Net neutrality why won't it be a fahkin' ally or sumptin I don't know...

fawkin oldtrality

fawkin oldtrality

We heard you!

I like that this person/persona puts individual flair to the title of each post. This guy just sees us as squirly little rascals

Call your Congressman and let him know about this...2 drink minimum.

4 at least.

Tss why not 40 or sumthin. Tha Chippah drinks a lot

Gettin fawkin zooted.

What kind of boogey-man story do you have for us if the rules that didn't exist before 2015 no longer exist?

They've been in court fighting this for years.

Well NN didn't exist before 2015, so please, what exactly where they fighting? Could it have been a set of provisions that already accomplish what NN supposedly does?

This does not support your claim that "they have been fighting this for years" - infact the court ruling it links to is the result of ISPs challenging the FCC following their NN proposals. FCC may have been crafting NN guidelines since 2009, but none where in place before 2015. In fact all the examples from the copy-pasta that people have been circulating where all resolved without NN. So what has changed?

This is due to the conflation of the concept of "Net Neutrality" and the FCC Title II legislation. If you call your regulation "Net Neutrality" then people will agree with it no matter the content.

For example, I propose the "Puppy Safety Act." The text of the bill requires every person to rape a puppy to death daily. But if you disagree with it you hate puppies, as it is about puppy safety.

Complete layman, but even if it's unnecessary there's nothing bad that comes with net neutrality laws, it's just contrarian to get angry at people trying to keep these protections 'just in case' ISPs start selling website packages like they do to Euro spics

Boooooooooo

The first decent take on net neutrality I've read on reddit and it's in the fuckin OnA sub.

I hope the FCC goes through with it so there will be less poor people on the internet.

Fewer poor people, not less; and we'll miss you.

I wish I could believe that :(

You silly gimp you are the poor

he got the joke you dunce, he meant he wishes that people would miss him

But then you cant laugh at the dumb poor people do shenanigans on 4chan and youtube

'Clowning Around'... wasn't that the name of Sam's wife's show? Where she put that Sideshow Bob looking mongoloid on camera.

The timing on the return of these vos plugs is great, right when we all kinda forgot about them they come back full force.

Does anyone know if something like this actually goes through there should be a way around it right? Like a vpn should just do it?

Alright this was a good one

You're Vos. You're 76 years old. You're playing someplace called the Velveeta room.

Joe Cumia is NOT a pedophile... in case anyone was asking.

Net neutrality is so cucked. I hope they get what they deserve.

Velveeta Room is a shithole. It's on 6th Street aka every drunken asshole you've ever wanted to punch in the face lurks.

LOL you rat bastard

Velveeta room? Gaaadamn I bet there’s like a buncha cheeze up in that MUG er sumpthin.

haha, well done. really well done.

I haven't been impressed by a vos plug in a while

Whatshe a bowl of mac and cheese and shizznit

Fewer poor people, not less; and we'll miss you.

Tss why not 40 or sumthin. Tha Chippah drinks a lot

This is due to the conflation of the concept of "Net Neutrality" and the FCC Title II legislation. If you call your regulation "Net Neutrality" then people will agree with it no matter the content.

For example, I propose the "Puppy Safety Act." The text of the bill requires every person to rape a puppy to death daily. But if you disagree with it you hate puppies, as it is about puppy safety.

But then you cant laugh at the dumb poor people do shenanigans on 4chan and youtube