I believe it's less to do with hypocrisy and more about the fact the left tends to attracts (I hate using this term but it's appropriate here) beta males who have no game and resort to cheap perverty behaviour.
The kind of people who run to 'big government', like a father figure they never had, to help them out whenever there are problems, instead of strong independent people who believe in supporting themselves.
A lot of sexual harassment stuff is about the girls feeling creeped out, it's not the actions themselves that are necessarily wrong, it's the fine line between creepy/attraction. That if it was done with finesse, humour, and with the girl attracted it wouldn't nearly be as big of a deal.
If only someone could dig up a photo of Roy Moore from 40 years ago. It's the picture of Franken being a pervy creep giving this accusation serious traction.
You sound like the type of faggot who calls women "brave" for "coming forward" with stories about how they regret trading their bodies for career favors
Wait, who was defending Moore here? Saying that Frankens downfall will be much faster because there is clear pictorial evidence, while the other guy only has word-of-mouth, is not defending the other guy.
The fact is sexual assault cases almost always rely on word-of-mouth from the victim is one of the most common reasons why the cases are hard to prosecute. Moore isn't special here.
The dumb joke tit grab picture doesn't prove the other things she alleges.
Anyway, it isn't just I think it is now 7 people accusing Moore of shit but also dozens of other people corroborating how big a creep he is. Saying it is just he said she said is bullshit.
Very few people even on the Right are defending the dude. But yes you're right the pic doesn't prove much more than possibly a distasteful joke at a minimum.
It's funny how spastic and faggy you are about this topic, and anyone who laughs at you for caring about another obvious empty scandal is a "pedophile"
Here's an idea, take your fake outrage and join the next Fag Parade (protest) you fucking sissie.
No we're not. Weinstein is a prime example of liberals taking out liberals that do stupid shit. I don't care what letter someone has after their name, if you abuse your power, if you abuse women, men, or children, you need to fucking GOOOOO.
In politics libs always point at old white republicans and imply they're closet homosexuals and pedos. Funny how their politicians aren't that far behind with these scandals nowadays.
Well those old white republicans that are adamantly anti-gay are usually the ones that end up being arrested in a truck stop for sucking some guys dick. I think the only surprise with Moore is that he was groping underage girls and not underage boys.
It doesn't matter though, we need to clean house, and not every (D) or every (R) is good or bad but the ones that are need to get the boot.
I like Franken a lot for many different reasons but if there isn't a reasonable explanation for this then fuckem. He's part of the problem.
Yes, your edgy high school ethics class thought experiment has been trotted out since the inception of ivf. Obviously I'd save the child who can feel pain and who has people that love it. The child also has a way better chance of living a full life than an ivf embryo, where 50% of them end in miscarriage.
The question is hollow. You would save a healthy child over 1000 terminal kids, that doesn't mean the terminal kids are of no moral value. You would save your family over 10 other families, you'd feel terrible but you'd do it.
Life begins at inception, but your question is one of false equivalence, I would support a woman aborting twins if her life was in danger, that doesn't mean the unborn twins are morally irrelevant to me.
Nah, you said what you think "one" would do, using the word "you." I don't care what you think someone might do. This is about you.
If you really would do what you said one would do a few comments ago, it's obvious you don't believe those embryos are alive. No amount of mental gymnastics is going to get around that. You don't believe they're children.
Its clear that your question fell flat on its face when I introduced nuance and shades. Your question only works when you insist on absolutes. Baby killers don't understand moral relevancy, like I said I'd save the child because of the parameters a child has that an unborn child doesn't. Somehow you take that as I don't care about unborn kids at all.
Bbbbbbut muh NUANCE says the snowflake calling the majority of the country baby killers. Careful you're starting to sound like one of them college boys!
Go pretend your beliefs are internally consistent. I'm done with you.
While I like your creative moral dilemma, it doesn't really address the issue because from most anti-abortion folks perspective "life" starts after conception. That's how they get out from under the masturbation question and that's how this guy will wriggle out out your moral connundrum (if he's smart enough). They're wrong about life starting at conception, but a question about sperm or embryos won't corner them.
Nice creative dilemma that you stole from some jerkoff who tweeted this a few months ago. The problem is it’s bullshit and an attempted trap for idiots. If you’re in a burning building and you can save one 10 year old or five 90 year olds, does anybody who chooses the 10 year old think 90 year olds aren’t human beings and it should be legal to kill them? I’m pro abortion btw, I just think your question is retarded and it annoys me that you’re stealing some shit you saw on twitter to seem like an intellectual. It also annoys me that you’re trying to be an intellectual in a sub that is meant for jokes about Opie’s luscious tits and Joe Matarese’s failed life.
When are liberals going to disavow the rapist in their midst!
Democrats have a toxic masculinity problem and i think they should get rid of all the white male democrats and create a more diverse and tolerant atmosphere.
i just heard the interview and the whore said she gave consent to practice a kiss after her berated her so that headline is misleading. and dont confuse me for being for that ultralib cocksucker i hate them all but the modern day witch hunt is kind of grating on me. 100% chance nothing comes of this. liberals do not eat their own, they circle the wagons.
If he did it jokingly and with finesse and game I'm sure the girl would have just laughed it off. But he probably creeped her out.
There's always that very fine line between being creepy and romantic. If you're going to be forward with girls, like what Al was doing here, you better be confident in your ability to make it playful and fun, so the girls are attracted to you. Otherwise you're going to have a bad time.
He didn't ask for consent. Women in the military are extra brave because they are surrounded by scary men
By their own logic he's guilty
Louie asked for consent and they still crucified him. You trying to justify it doesn't matter. "Heyyy it was just a goof!" doesn't work with these people
Hey ladies, your enemy isn't the jock, soldier, frat-boy. It is the cuck deviant "artist" that tricked you into thinking he was your "ally," so he can fuck you without your consent when you least expect it.
There are foxes in your henhouse. Do something about it.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)
A TV host and sports broadcaster on Thursday accused Sen. Al Franken of kissing and groping her without her consent in 2006.
Leeann Tweeden accused Franken of groping her, without her consent, while she was asleep and provided a photo as evidence.
"On the day of the show Franken and I were alone backstage going over our lines one last time. He said to me, 'We need to rehearse the kiss.' I laughed and ignored him. Then he said it again. I said something like, 'Relax Al, this isn't SNLwe don't need to rehearse the kiss.'".
96 comments
1 eastriverdriveII 2017-11-16
$1, Bob!
1 cottonsweatpants 2017-11-16
I'm not a political guy, but liberals seem to be losing their moral high ground, no?
6 SirWallaceII 2017-11-16
It's almost as if the most vocal about being the best and most proper people are complete frauds and degenerates actually. (((So weird)))
1 dmix 2017-11-16
I believe it's less to do with hypocrisy and more about the fact the left tends to attracts (I hate using this term but it's appropriate here) beta males who have no game and resort to cheap perverty behaviour.
The kind of people who run to 'big government', like a father figure they never had, to help them out whenever there are problems, instead of strong independent people who believe in supporting themselves.
A lot of sexual harassment stuff is about the girls feeling creeped out, it's not the actions themselves that are necessarily wrong, it's the fine line between creepy/attraction. That if it was done with finesse, humour, and with the girl attracted it wouldn't nearly be as big of a deal.
2 Yujiro_Hanma_ 2017-11-16
Depends who with.
I feel they are gaining a whole lot of ground with voters like me.
1 alltheword 2017-11-16
He will be run out for this while Roy Moore gets elected.
2 LHCGMFP 2017-11-16
If only someone could dig up a photo of Roy Moore from 40 years ago. It's the picture of Franken being a pervy creep giving this accusation serious traction.
1 alltheword 2017-11-16
Yes, the dozens of people are all lying. It is a vast conspiracy.
Thank you for proving my point.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
"dozens of people in a group have never lied before"
Why did you type out that thought, realize you used "dozens" and yet still hit enter
0 alltheword 2017-11-16
They aren't 'a group'. They are individuals with their own stories about Roy Moore.
0 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
You sound like the type of faggot who calls women "brave" for "coming forward" with stories about how they regret trading their bodies for career favors
1 alltheword 2017-11-16
You are a person who is defending a grown man creeping on 14 year olds. Worried your hobby is under threat?
1 dmix 2017-11-16
Wait, who was defending Moore here? Saying that Frankens downfall will be much faster because there is clear pictorial evidence, while the other guy only has word-of-mouth, is not defending the other guy.
The fact is sexual assault cases almost always rely on word-of-mouth from the victim is one of the most common reasons why the cases are hard to prosecute. Moore isn't special here.
1 alltheword 2017-11-16
The dumb joke tit grab picture doesn't prove the other things she alleges.
Anyway, it isn't just I think it is now 7 people accusing Moore of shit but also dozens of other people corroborating how big a creep he is. Saying it is just he said she said is bullshit.
1 dmix 2017-11-16
Very few people even on the Right are defending the dude. But yes you're right the pic doesn't prove much more than possibly a distasteful joke at a minimum.
Fondling 14yr olds is much worse.
Regardless the dude didn't defend him.
0 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
God, could you be anymore of a fucking fag?
0 alltheword 2017-11-16
Do you ask the parents before you ask out the 14 year olds?
1 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
It's funny how spastic and faggy you are about this topic, and anyone who laughs at you for caring about another obvious empty scandal is a "pedophile"
Here's an idea, take your fake outrage and join the next Fag Parade (protest) you fucking sissie.
0 alltheword 2017-11-16
You are trying to hard.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
Says the guy on the O&A sub pitching multiple fits about a political sex allegation.
Slit your throat.
1 xynix_ie 2017-11-16
No we're not. Weinstein is a prime example of liberals taking out liberals that do stupid shit. I don't care what letter someone has after their name, if you abuse your power, if you abuse women, men, or children, you need to fucking GOOOOO.
2 cottonsweatpants 2017-11-16
In politics libs always point at old white republicans and imply they're closet homosexuals and pedos. Funny how their politicians aren't that far behind with these scandals nowadays.
Just an observation from an outsider
1 xynix_ie 2017-11-16
Well those old white republicans that are adamantly anti-gay are usually the ones that end up being arrested in a truck stop for sucking some guys dick. I think the only surprise with Moore is that he was groping underage girls and not underage boys.
It doesn't matter though, we need to clean house, and not every (D) or every (R) is good or bad but the ones that are need to get the boot.
I like Franken a lot for many different reasons but if there isn't a reasonable explanation for this then fuckem. He's part of the problem.
1 Press2ForEnglish 2017-11-16
Why did they let him get away with it for so long?
1 DeafandMutePenguin 2017-11-16
So did Bill Clinton rape Juanita Broadderick?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
People who take pride in baby killing don't really have morals
1 metameme 2017-11-16
Got a question for you.
You're in a fertility clinic. Doesn't matter why. There's a fire, and you have a time limit. You can only do one:
If you try to save both, all 3 of you die. Which do you choose?
3 cottonsweatpants 2017-11-16
Flee with their audio equipment
2 dakkar1 2017-11-16
why would anyone give a fuck about frozen embryos when you have a living ch... wait, what color is the kid?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
I don't think people should be extracting eggs, mixing them with sperm in a petri dish and storing them in freezers. Just fucking adopt.
1 [deleted] 2017-11-16
[deleted]
1 metameme 2017-11-16
So you would save the child?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Yes, your edgy high school ethics class thought experiment has been trotted out since the inception of ivf. Obviously I'd save the child who can feel pain and who has people that love it. The child also has a way better chance of living a full life than an ivf embryo, where 50% of them end in miscarriage.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
So you're saying at conception life only exists in part? 500 children seems like an easy choice. Aren't the embryos alive?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
The question is hollow. You would save a healthy child over 1000 terminal kids, that doesn't mean the terminal kids are of no moral value. You would save your family over 10 other families, you'd feel terrible but you'd do it.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
I don't understand. Are the embryos living children or not?
What if they were 5 month old fetuses?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Life begins at inception, but your question is one of false equivalence, I would support a woman aborting twins if her life was in danger, that doesn't mean the unborn twins are morally irrelevant to me.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
You still didn't answer the question. What would you do?
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Stop shaking with rage and being disingenuous and you will indeed see I answered the question a few replies ago.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
Nah, you said what you think "one" would do, using the word "you." I don't care what you think someone might do. This is about you.
If you really would do what you said one would do a few comments ago, it's obvious you don't believe those embryos are alive. No amount of mental gymnastics is going to get around that. You don't believe they're children.
You just like pretending to be self-righteous.
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Its clear that your question fell flat on its face when I introduced nuance and shades. Your question only works when you insist on absolutes. Baby killers don't understand moral relevancy, like I said I'd save the child because of the parameters a child has that an unborn child doesn't. Somehow you take that as I don't care about unborn kids at all.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
Bbbbbbut muh NUANCE says the snowflake calling the majority of the country baby killers. Careful you're starting to sound like one of them college boys!
Go pretend your beliefs are internally consistent. I'm done with you.
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Majority? More people are pro-life kid.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/225975/share-of-americans-who-are-pro-life-or-pro-choice/
Only 1.5% of pregnant women have an abortion, not many can kill their own child no matter what their circumstances are.
My beliefs are entirely consistent and you've said nothing to convince me otherwise, baby killer.
1 metameme 2017-11-16
Is the Right using probabilities to express the value of a fetus now? A fetus is worth 50% of a life... Hmmmm.
You're saying a woman gets to have one free abortion before you'll call her a murderer?
1 Press2ForEnglish 2017-11-16
1 Sudley 2017-11-16
While I like your creative moral dilemma, it doesn't really address the issue because from most anti-abortion folks perspective "life" starts after conception. That's how they get out from under the masturbation question and that's how this guy will wriggle out out your moral connundrum (if he's smart enough). They're wrong about life starting at conception, but a question about sperm or embryos won't corner them.
Peckahs.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-11-16
What does a fire have to do with the degrading morality of women and the fact that they shouldn't be allowed to be revolting?
1 FurdTerguson88 2017-11-16
Nice creative dilemma that you stole from some jerkoff who tweeted this a few months ago. The problem is it’s bullshit and an attempted trap for idiots. If you’re in a burning building and you can save one 10 year old or five 90 year olds, does anybody who chooses the 10 year old think 90 year olds aren’t human beings and it should be legal to kill them? I’m pro abortion btw, I just think your question is retarded and it annoys me that you’re stealing some shit you saw on twitter to seem like an intellectual. It also annoys me that you’re trying to be an intellectual in a sub that is meant for jokes about Opie’s luscious tits and Joe Matarese’s failed life.
1 fingerrockets 2017-11-16
Ladies and gentlemen the Enola Gay has successfully delivered it's payload over reddit!
1 timothymodine 2017-11-16
Eat the samples and fondle the child. Let’s go out on a high note.
1 spaghetti-in-pockets 2017-11-16
This shit meme again.
1 fingerrockets 2017-11-16
No they have morals they just happen to be baby killin morals.
1 Boredghost77 2017-11-16
When are liberals going to disavow the rapist in their midst! Democrats have a toxic masculinity problem and i think they should get rid of all the white male democrats and create a more diverse and tolerant atmosphere.
1 opiecide 2017-11-16
This one really makes me happy.
1 deanthecleanmachine 2017-11-16
women takeover
1 BoatHack2 2017-11-16
Leeann Tweeden is a good egg. Has done plenty of topless photo shoots and never got on board with the whole feminism craze.
1 hard_to_explain 2017-11-16
Now this is fun
1 Bangunss 2017-11-16
Another white male abusing their privilege
1 WeWuzKangz 2017-11-16
(((white)))
1 fingerrockets 2017-11-16
Im good enough.
Im smart enough.
And women want me.
1 ThatsVile 2017-11-16
"LIBRULS EATING LIBRULS!!"
1 BoardroomBimmy 2017-11-16
I hear they eat their own.
1 SibHashian13 2017-11-16
Oh yes! This is a good one
1 Witty-User_name 2017-11-16
Hey Al Franken what area ya doin?
5 HouseboatWaterbed 2017-11-16
Spottin sleepin slits and honkin their hoo-ters!
2 deep_legal_shit 2017-11-16
hey rabbi whatcha doin?
1 clintcranford 2017-11-16
WOMAN??
1 dakkar1 2017-11-16
i just heard the interview and the whore said she gave consent to practice a kiss after her berated her so that headline is misleading. and dont confuse me for being for that ultralib cocksucker i hate them all but the modern day witch hunt is kind of grating on me. 100% chance nothing comes of this. liberals do not eat their own, they circle the wagons.
1 Seek247 2017-11-16
We found Bill Clinton's reddit account.
1 thrillated 2017-11-16
BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST
1 peckaface 2017-11-16
Didn't those bitches give Louie consent to jerk off in front of them?
1 willrahmer 2017-11-16
Al seems pretty funny to me.
1 dmix 2017-11-16
If he did it jokingly and with finesse and game I'm sure the girl would have just laughed it off. But he probably creeped her out.
There's always that very fine line between being creepy and romantic. If you're going to be forward with girls, like what Al was doing here, you better be confident in your ability to make it playful and fun, so the girls are attracted to you. Otherwise you're going to have a bad time.
1 Lasagna_Hat 2017-11-16
He didn't ask for consent. Women in the military are extra brave because they are surrounded by scary men
By their own logic he's guilty
Louie asked for consent and they still crucified him. You trying to justify it doesn't matter. "Heyyy it was just a goof!" doesn't work with these people
1 deep_legal_shit 2017-11-16
Please let Jon Stewart be next.
1 David_Tosk 2017-11-16
Then the world would end
1 goo-gobbler 2017-11-16
Grabbed her breasts through a bullet proof kevlar vest. What an animal.
1 WindiPaper 2017-11-16
Will liberals blame the victim?
1 Seek247 2017-11-16
Hey ladies, your enemy isn't the jock, soldier, frat-boy. It is the cuck deviant "artist" that tricked you into thinking he was your "ally," so he can fuck you without your consent when you least expect it.
There are foxes in your henhouse. Do something about it.
1 DeafandMutePenguin 2017-11-16
Nail on the head.
1 Tanwhiteman 2017-11-16
Yes! I love it. Liberal faggots getting their just deserts
1 timothymodine 2017-11-16
Ummm.....
1 Tanwhiteman 2017-11-16
Yes?
1 timothymodine 2017-11-16
What is he in the fawkin sahara or sumtin?
1 Tanwhiteman 2017-11-16
Tsss
1 bombvest 2017-11-16
it's your turn to cry!!!! snort METOOMETOOMETOO.....
1 puppy_action_team 2017-11-16
I'm sure Stephen Colbert will have plenty to talk about tonight....oh he is just a talking puppet
1 Belchides 2017-11-16
Thank god. I honestly thought he was gonna be the compromised candidate for 2020. Dems are fucked.
1 HitEmWTheHeinnn 2017-11-16
You think in mid-rape he says, because I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and gosh darn it; people like me!
???
1 autotldr 2017-11-16
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 87%. (I'm a bot)
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Franken#1 wrote#2 photo#3 kiss#4 sexual#5
1 aprosbro 2017-11-16
This one is pretty weak though.
1 Spokker 2017-11-16
Reset the accusation clock
Haha the photo of Franken grabbing at her tits is hillarious. He looks like an animal and it's the first time he ever touched a woman.
1 cabaretcabaret 2017-11-16
He isn't touching her in that photo
1 fingerrockets 2017-11-16
Hover hands
1 retromingent_cunt 2017-11-16
Gropin' them buhbah's
1 StuntPeckah 2017-11-16
"Whadda ya say, Allllll?"
1 mannylou 2017-11-16
finally something ant can get behind. (slaps table)
0 Phkna1 2017-11-16
Wow. The left is really going to eat itself alive .
1 BoardroomBimmy 2017-11-16
I hear they eat their own.