What makes this more sad though is: the news station knew he felt this way, they knew asking him would get this answer (may have asked him before in pre-interview), and they set up beforehand how the cast would act.
This was most likely 100% orchestrated for political points and or just to get people to talk about it.
yep, tennis fans especially on /r/tennis are pathetic. wimbledon pays the women the same prize money despite them doing maxium 3 sets, the men can go up to 5 and often do. so they factually get the same money for more work
If someone ever said to me "We are offering you the chance to apologize," I would have to restrain myself from trying to bit their fucking top lip off.
The gap narrows with endurance events, but men still edge out over women. Women do occasionally win ultra marathons over men, but these events are packed full of amateurs and semi pros.
The bigger question is why do men and women compete separately in chess, and why has there never been a female chess master. Even taking physicality out of it, there are clear and known distinctions between the sexes.
Why do yo mean a female chess master? There's a lot of female grandmasters. Judit polgar is one of the top chess players in the world, and she does compete with men.
Sir, Judit Polgar stopped competing 2 years ago and it's 12 years since her peak rating of 8th in the world. Which is very good, obviously, but even then there were 7 men better than her.
Currently the best ranked woman is 80th best player in the world.
So, yeah, men and women do compete together and it proves without a doubt that men are much better as a whole.
That's silly man, if anything, Judit proves that women can get as good at chess as men. There's probably like 200 men for every woman in chess, cause women have less autism/don't give a shit. The Polgar girls were groomed since they were 2 years old for chess, and all three of them broke into the top 50 or something. Probably empty shells as human beings, but they're women anyway so not much was lost.
They do play together, it's just that there are far more men.
And that's because men's IQ spreads out far more than women's. They bunch up around 100, and we're all over the place. We have more dumbies, and more smarties. We have more everything really, good and bad.
My father once beat Joan Benoit in the Falmouth Road Race. (And a couple of marathons) He was a serious amateur runner and also smoked cigarettes. She's probably the greatest American female distance runner. So I'd challenge that assessment.
Why can't they just get it into their thick skulls that it's ok to be inferior to men in every way? Probably too concerned with baking and sewing to be able to process such a clearly observable, irrefutable fact.
Men and women aren't physically equal, but neither is a 5'5" guy and a 6'5" guy. It's why we have gender division in sports, the same way we have divisions based on size. It doesn't mean one division is better or more interesting.
Divisions based on size only exist in combat sports. And women are free to compete in combat sports vs men who are the same size as they are. In basketball Mogsby Bogues was 5'3 playing with guys over 7 feet. Isiah Thomas right now is 5'10 and is one of the best players in the league. Lionel Messi is 5'5 and is arguably the best soccer player in the world.
Yep, this is the liberal equivalent of "I don't believe in global warming". This is there "I don't believe in evolution" moment. When it comes to gender and biology, they trust the social sciences and discount the actual science.
True heroes of society. These great gentlemen push forward the idea that women are our physical and intellectual equals. Surly, in hopes of dismantling the notion that a cunt should not be bopped in her nose if she burns thy dinner or talks back.
The brainwashing is legitimately scary. They act so taken aback by the thought that he might not be ready and chomping at the bit to grovelingly retract a perfectly reasonable estimation.
It's like in these dummies' minds saying "women are 700th" at one thing is saying that men are 700 times better than women period. They need to see it that irrationally because they need to feel like victims.
I just can't get over the intentional stupidity of it.
I guess that cunt Norah O'Donnelly memory holed this event.
Another event dubbed a "Battle of the Sexes" took place during the 1998 Australian Open[51] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world's top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as "a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager".[52][53] The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park,[54] after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two beers. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2.[55] Braasch said afterwards, "500 and above, no chance". He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game "fun".[56] Braasch said the big difference was that men can chase down shots much easier, and that men put spin on the ball that the women can't handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350.
I would never divide from women. The one thing you, I, Isis, (((them))) and all Americans can agree is that we just want women to recognize that they need to respect and understand why there are to be treated as dogs.
Of course he had a clue, but he didn't say it. See, the thing is nobody says McEnroe is factually wrong. They are just shocked and outraged that he says something that isn't allowed to be said. It's like he didn't get the message that some truths are not supposed to be said out loud.
I bet a female writer came up with that one too. There's no way Charlie Rose thought that motherfucker would take the bait and rank himself high. It's like when a chick tries to argue and thinks she has a really good point but it goes nowhere because it was based on her projecting own inferiority, thinking she can call every little move a "toxic male" would make.
This isn't even a debate. You see all these excellent female players kill it against their peers and every now and then someone makes the argument "Well, let's see how they do against the men!"
I've heard the UConn women's basketball team that curbstomps everyone, practices against male intermural teams and get beat most of the time. There are stories of Olympic-level women's teams playing against high school boys' teams, the latter of whom usually win.
It's pretty much understood that women's teams play against not even men's but boys' teams knowing they will get their teeth kicked in, but it hones them for their upcoming event.
I cannot believe that people in this position actually put up with these presumptuous know-nothing cunts threatening and rolling their eyes at you while attempting to force you to agree with some retarded thought they're trying to push on you.
As I have no tact, I would have been cursing and telling them to shut the fuck up while asking why Charlie Rose is asking me questions a middle schooler would think up, and what someone who is only famous for being Oprah's friend knows about tennis.
Why are they so calm? Why do they ignore the little cunt things like the face that white bitch was making? Why do they just let it slide? Why don't they call them out? It can't be fear, because he didn't back down. Why the fuck do they just sit there and let them do that to them every single time?
The only sport that women excel in is volleyball, and that's only because it gets higher ratings because men just want to watch their big fat asses jiggle around in tight spandex shorts that hug their vagina lips.
What makes this more sad though is: the news station knew he felt this way, they knew asking him would get this answer (may have asked him before in pre-interview), and they set up beforehand how the cast would act.
This was most likely 100% orchestrated for political points and or just to get people to talk about it.
yep, tennis fans especially on /r/tennis are pathetic. wimbledon pays the women the same prize money despite them doing maxium 3 sets, the men can go up to 5 and often do. so they factually get the same money for more work
I bet a female writer came up with that one too. There's no way Charlie Rose thought that motherfucker would take the bait and rank himself high. It's like when a chick tries to argue and thinks she has a really good point but it goes nowhere because it was based on her projecting own inferiority, thinking she can call every little move a "toxic male" would make.
91 comments
1 PhilipMarma 2017-07-29
Love Johnny Mac. He's 100% right, and he's always been a huge advocate for Serena. Glad he's not rolling over on this.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
He's one year older than 57 years young.
1 turnthemaround 2017-07-29
What makes this more sad though is: the news station knew he felt this way, they knew asking him would get this answer (may have asked him before in pre-interview), and they set up beforehand how the cast would act.
This was most likely 100% orchestrated for political points and or just to get people to talk about it.
1 TriangleDimes 2017-07-29
I don't feel like disbelieving in magic today so I'm going to go ahead and keep believing my nigger McEnroe is walking around shitting on everyone.
1 jellyravel23 2017-07-29
yep, tennis fans especially on /r/tennis are pathetic. wimbledon pays the women the same prize money despite them doing maxium 3 sets, the men can go up to 5 and often do. so they factually get the same money for more work
1 sneakpeekbot 2017-07-29
Here's a sneak peek of /r/tennis using the top posts of the year!
#1: Roger Federer is the 2017 Australian Open champion
#2: She's too good | 80 comments
#3: The Williams sisters are meeting in a Major final | 177 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
1 jellyravel23 2017-07-29
fuck off
1 zenicaone 2017-07-29
cunt who probably doesnt even watch tennis or any other sport : "we are off offering you a chance, would you apologize for your statement?"
Macenroe : NO!
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
If someone ever said to me "We are offering you the chance to apologize," I would have to restrain myself from trying to bit their fucking top lip off.
1 zenicaone 2017-07-29
last time I heard such sentence is when I was in elementary school or something like that.
1 PeeSoup3030 2017-07-29
I read somewhere that the only kind of physical sport where women have an advantage over men is marathon running
1 JespyZero 2017-07-29
The fastest woman marathon runner is still almost 15 minutes slower than the fastest man.
1 Ant_Sucks 2017-07-29
The gap narrows with endurance events, but men still edge out over women. Women do occasionally win ultra marathons over men, but these events are packed full of amateurs and semi pros.
1 PhilipMarma 2017-07-29
The bigger question is why do men and women compete separately in chess, and why has there never been a female chess master. Even taking physicality out of it, there are clear and known distinctions between the sexes.
1 UnfunnyFaggott 2017-07-29
Innate sexual differences? LOL do you even fucking love science, bro?
1 holdon_holdon_holdon 2017-07-29
We're all a blank slate bro. Do you even tabula rasa?
1 ananabu 2017-07-29
Why do yo mean a female chess master? There's a lot of female grandmasters. Judit polgar is one of the top chess players in the world, and she does compete with men.
1 PhilipMarma 2017-07-29
I stand corrected.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
Do you wear leg braces?
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
goddamn that's bad
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
You're looking in a mirror?
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
I'm rubber you're glue
1 deanthecleanmachine 2017-07-29
youre a disgrace for kmowing that
1 open-and-honest 2017-07-29
Sir, Judit Polgar stopped competing 2 years ago and it's 12 years since her peak rating of 8th in the world. Which is very good, obviously, but even then there were 7 men better than her.
Currently the best ranked woman is 80th best player in the world.
So, yeah, men and women do compete together and it proves without a doubt that men are much better as a whole.
1 sherockradio 2017-07-29
That's silly man, if anything, Judit proves that women can get as good at chess as men. There's probably like 200 men for every woman in chess, cause women have less autism/don't give a shit. The Polgar girls were groomed since they were 2 years old for chess, and all three of them broke into the top 50 or something. Probably empty shells as human beings, but they're women anyway so not much was lost.
1 TriangleDimes 2017-07-29
Yeah women would totally dominate if they weren't so busy.
1 frrunkis 2017-07-29
They do play together, it's just that there are far more men.
And that's because men's IQ spreads out far more than women's. They bunch up around 100, and we're all over the place. We have more dumbies, and more smarties. We have more everything really, good and bad.
1 fervt 2017-07-29
They need extra time on the clock to reapply their make-up and to make sure that the potatoes don't boil over.
1 Ant_Sucks 2017-07-29
Like the Irish could even play chess.
1 hoohootellemkeith 2017-07-29
My father once beat Joan Benoit in the Falmouth Road Race. (And a couple of marathons) He was a serious amateur runner and also smoked cigarettes. She's probably the greatest American female distance runner. So I'd challenge that assessment.
1 thrillated 2017-07-29
I wish your dad got beat by Chris Benoit.
See cause...
1 DOPIEandSTANLEY 2017-07-29
I heard it was rock climbing, and other strength vs bodyweight events like the bent arm hang.
1 holdon_holdon_holdon 2017-07-29
I heard it was baking.
1 passovercoke 2017-07-29
meh, even world-class chefs and pastry chefs are mostly men.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
Because they are always running away from their problems, like cowards.
1 JoeCumiasCockBreath 2017-07-29
"Would you like to apologise?"
Haha no he wouldn't, slit.
God, women are fucking insufferable.
Why can't they just get it into their thick skulls that it's ok to be inferior to men in every way? Probably too concerned with baking and sewing to be able to process such a clearly observable, irrefutable fact.
1 ffffantomas 2017-07-29
well sir that´s a little out of line
1 madameroach 2017-07-29
just let them celebrate it...
1 TinKnockinMoroccan 2017-07-29
Men and women aren't physically equal, but neither is a 5'5" guy and a 6'5" guy. It's why we have gender division in sports, the same way we have divisions based on size. It doesn't mean one division is better or more interesting.
1 grocery_man 2017-07-29
Yes it does. The men's game is much better and more interesting.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
Nah I much prefer watching the pretty ladies in short shorts for 3 sets max.
1 grocery_man 2017-07-29
Fag.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
No thanks, I don't smoke, m8.
😉
1 DOPIEandSTANLEY 2017-07-29
I'd like to observe silently from the bushes as you stub your toe in sandals, you fucking dweeb.
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
But the arousing little yelps!
1 Joemomma101 2017-07-29
Divisions based on size only exist in combat sports. And women are free to compete in combat sports vs men who are the same size as they are. In basketball Mogsby Bogues was 5'3 playing with guys over 7 feet. Isiah Thomas right now is 5'10 and is one of the best players in the league. Lionel Messi is 5'5 and is arguably the best soccer player in the world.
1 RatherPleasent 2017-07-29
Believe it or not the hosts could have been more skewed in their views. At least they admitted that men are stronger than women.
I've met Professors who say men and women are equal in strength, and its only societal factors that affect strength.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
Tss maybe they're amateurfessors or sumpthin
1 DOPIEandSTANLEY 2017-07-29
A laugh from the chipper is your reward
1 littlepeteferguson 2017-07-29
(((Professors)))
1 obamabeblacknshiet 2017-07-29
Beat me to it.
1 Joemomma101 2017-07-29
Yep, this is the liberal equivalent of "I don't believe in global warming". This is there "I don't believe in evolution" moment. When it comes to gender and biology, they trust the social sciences and discount the actual science.
1 timallenonacid 2017-07-29
True heroes of society. These great gentlemen push forward the idea that women are our physical and intellectual equals. Surly, in hopes of dismantling the notion that a cunt should not be bopped in her nose if she burns thy dinner or talks back.
1 honeycomb_foetus 2017-07-29
Absolutely true. People born with a penis may be stronger than people born with a vagina, but that's not the same thing.
1 David_Tosk 2017-07-29
Jesus. Women play with faster balls, yet they serve 20 km/h slower than the men. The men's game is a faster game. Why even try to compare?
Also, if you want to fix female tennis, make them cut out the retarded groaning. I can't watch because of that.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
Strange because that's one of the only reasons I do watch women's tennis.
1 fuego_fernando 2017-07-29
Same, buddy. And although the Williams sisters are of the brown variety. They had have some nice dumpers on them.
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
They're atrocious animals.
1 fuego_fernando 2017-07-29
You gay.
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
Ew you watch for the sportsmanship? Queer.
1 David_Tosk 2017-07-29
Well, I also watch competitive chess, formula 1 and cycling? What does that make me? X4
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
A sporting gentleman
1 David_Tosk 2017-07-29
It actually appears that he won the discussion and they sort of agreed. Very rare.
1 cabaretcabaret 2017-07-29
If truly have a discussion, everyone wins
Jimspiration
1 packitchofsositch 2017-07-29
The brainwashing is legitimately scary. They act so taken aback by the thought that he might not be ready and chomping at the bit to grovelingly retract a perfectly reasonable estimation.
It's like in these dummies' minds saying "women are 700th" at one thing is saying that men are 700 times better than women period. They need to see it that irrationally because they need to feel like victims.
I just can't get over the intentional stupidity of it.
1 davit82013 2017-07-29
Best of 5. End of discussion.
1 bonniesretardsister 2017-07-29
I guess that cunt Norah O'Donnelly memory holed this event.
1 obamabeblacknshiet 2017-07-29
Holy shit. How was this not mentioned?
1 bonniesretardsister 2017-07-29
McEnroe doesn't care about the argument enough to do any research.
1 fuego_fernando 2017-07-29
Exactly.
1 jacktorrance6290 2017-07-29
They asked him his opinion and he gave it....
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
Some of you love men too much to be straight.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
It's not that we love men, it's that despite needing women, we have no respect for them based on their own behavior.
1 Zombied77 2017-07-29
(((Them))). Let's not fall for divisiveness here.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
I would never divide from women. The one thing you, I, Isis, (((them))) and all Americans can agree is that we just want women to recognize that they need to respect and understand why there are to be treated as dogs.
1 throwawizzlemahnizzl 2017-07-29
A shepherd doesn't have to respect his sheep to be a good shepherd.
1 RacistPigeon 2017-07-29
Johnny Mac for President
1 RealTonySchiavone 2017-07-29
You can tell when they asked him to rank himself, they were completely expecting him to rank himself higher, but they had no response when he didn't.
So you say Serena would be 700th in mens, where would you rank?
Probably about 1200.
.........
1 PaintedPicture 2017-07-29
I thought 1200 is impressive. If he really is ranked that high, that's unbelievable
1 drakeyequation 2017-07-29
Or when McEnroe asked Charlie Rose where he would rank Serena overall and he didn't have a clue. So how the fuck is his qualified to comment?
1 d4n4n 2017-07-29
Of course he had a clue, but he didn't say it. See, the thing is nobody says McEnroe is factually wrong. They are just shocked and outraged that he says something that isn't allowed to be said. It's like he didn't get the message that some truths are not supposed to be said out loud.
1 TriangleDimes 2017-07-29
Yeah that was the best part, he knew Charlie had an opinion and the only way out of it was for Charlie to say he doesn't know what he's talking about.
1 d4n4n 2017-07-29
He should have pushed him to say a number.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
I bet a female writer came up with that one too. There's no way Charlie Rose thought that motherfucker would take the bait and rank himself high. It's like when a chick tries to argue and thinks she has a really good point but it goes nowhere because it was based on her projecting own inferiority, thinking she can call every little move a "toxic male" would make.
1 Robert-T-Pooner 2017-07-29
Fuck it, let's allow some women to compete in the NFL and give all these women a chance to prove their point.
1 Jarvismcjigglesteins 2017-07-29
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDVxrpTreWA
So cute.
1 Robert-T-Pooner 2017-07-29
The son from Breaking Bad could have done a better job than that.
1 Reaktif 2017-07-29
This need not be theoretical. Even in chess, which requires none of the height or bone density advantages, women get dusted by their male peers.
I'm sure NPR has some kind of an explanation.
1 MushroomFacedAsshole 2017-07-29
This isn't even a debate. You see all these excellent female players kill it against their peers and every now and then someone makes the argument "Well, let's see how they do against the men!"
I've heard the UConn women's basketball team that curbstomps everyone, practices against male intermural teams and get beat most of the time. There are stories of Olympic-level women's teams playing against high school boys' teams, the latter of whom usually win.
It's pretty much understood that women's teams play against not even men's but boys' teams knowing they will get their teeth kicked in, but it hones them for their upcoming event.
1 MattressBoy 2017-07-29
The womens' national soccer team can't even handle fourteen year old boys. The media patronizes the hell out of women.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
I cannot believe that people in this position actually put up with these presumptuous know-nothing cunts threatening and rolling their eyes at you while attempting to force you to agree with some retarded thought they're trying to push on you.
As I have no tact, I would have been cursing and telling them to shut the fuck up while asking why Charlie Rose is asking me questions a middle schooler would think up, and what someone who is only famous for being Oprah's friend knows about tennis.
Why are they so calm? Why do they ignore the little cunt things like the face that white bitch was making? Why do they just let it slide? Why don't they call them out? It can't be fear, because he didn't back down. Why the fuck do they just sit there and let them do that to them every single time?
1 insertclevereference 2017-07-29
Because the (((cunts))) own the airwaves and the only way to get you fact based point across is to let them "win" the argument.
It's like golfing with the CEO and he wins all the time but you and your co-workers know the real deal.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
The only sport that women excel in is volleyball, and that's only because it gets higher ratings because men just want to watch their big fat asses jiggle around in tight spandex shorts that hug their vagina lips.
1 aegrotatio 2017-07-29
1 puppy_action_team 2017-07-29
He isn't wrong
1 I_Hate_Knickers_Deux 2017-07-29
He's one year older than 57 years young.
1 turnthemaround 2017-07-29
What makes this more sad though is: the news station knew he felt this way, they knew asking him would get this answer (may have asked him before in pre-interview), and they set up beforehand how the cast would act.
This was most likely 100% orchestrated for political points and or just to get people to talk about it.
1 jellyravel23 2017-07-29
yep, tennis fans especially on /r/tennis are pathetic. wimbledon pays the women the same prize money despite them doing maxium 3 sets, the men can go up to 5 and often do. so they factually get the same money for more work
1 zenicaone 2017-07-29
cunt who probably doesnt even watch tennis or any other sport : "we are off offering you a chance, would you apologize for your statement?"
Macenroe : NO!
1 PaintedPicture 2017-07-29
I thought 1200 is impressive. If he really is ranked that high, that's unbelievable
1 drakeyequation 2017-07-29
Or when McEnroe asked Charlie Rose where he would rank Serena overall and he didn't have a clue. So how the fuck is his qualified to comment?
1 MattressBoy 2017-07-29
The womens' national soccer team can't even handle fourteen year old boys. The media patronizes the hell out of women.
1 fuego_fernando 2017-07-29
Same, buddy. And although the Williams sisters are of the brown variety. They had have some nice dumpers on them.
1 onemancrimespree 2017-07-29
I bet a female writer came up with that one too. There's no way Charlie Rose thought that motherfucker would take the bait and rank himself high. It's like when a chick tries to argue and thinks she has a really good point but it goes nowhere because it was based on her projecting own inferiority, thinking she can call every little move a "toxic male" would make.