Tiffany would probably be more professional, but even though she's probably a timid cock sucker, for an overall experience putting my dick in Ivanka Trump's mouth would be much more satisfying. To each their own I guess.
Ivanka has an intentionally calculated, somewhat sultry way of speaking. It's heavy on enunciation and it's pretty attention grabbing, I'm sure some language expert could actually explain what was going on but I don't think its not something to comment on. I'm not a fan of Watters but there's some serious projection in GQ's interpretation.
9 comments
n/a Guinness525 2017-04-26
That womanish, condescending tone - a staple of milennial writers.
n/a BaggySpandex 2017-04-26
Yuck. I bet it's an over-annunciated, super deliberate tone like "OB TAMPON WHOOOOP WHOOOOP"
n/a majestik6 2017-04-26
GQ is a magazine for gay men, so I have to give them a pass if their writers lean way hard to the left.
The thing that pisses me off is when "mainstream" publications are hopelessly biased.
n/a Moveinslience 2017-04-26
Imagine getting blown by Ivanka Trump ...
n/a VigoTheCarpethian 2017-04-26
Tiffany is better. I would still gladly take one from her jew ass though.
n/a harrisongooch 2017-04-26
Tiffany would probably be more professional, but even though she's probably a timid cock sucker, for an overall experience putting my dick in Ivanka Trump's mouth would be much more satisfying. To each their own I guess.
n/a Stilichobro 2017-04-26
Am I the only one getting sick of this "Women are people too" angle?
n/a VigoTheCarpethian 2017-04-26
The aren't people.
If you get in a fight with him they break their ribs and bite their own hands, only to blame it on you.
n/a knitro 2017-04-26
Ivanka has an intentionally calculated, somewhat sultry way of speaking. It's heavy on enunciation and it's pretty attention grabbing, I'm sure some language expert could actually explain what was going on but I don't think its not something to comment on. I'm not a fan of Watters but there's some serious projection in GQ's interpretation.