by the way.... your cunts in the sink

Mice are sold specifically for snakes to eat. What's the difference between a man eating live mice and a snake eating live mice?

Probably the chewing, for better or worse...

Quicker death than being swallowed alive...

Oh...well shit that's a good point. But is having your skull crushed by teeth worse than being slowly dissolved in acid?

I honestly couldn't tell ya.

I hear ya, I had to double down on that other cunt because he called me stupid though. It's disgusting someone could do that - but take solace knowing that it's these mice's destiny to die a savage and horrible death, even if the thought of a human doing it is totes grody.

For starters you're not a fucking snake. Hey my dog fucks my other dog in the ass all the time, what's the difference right? Hop on.

Don't tell me what I can and can't do to my dog. It's MY dog!

don't be a ta ull tale, it's a dog prostitution ring

Kibbles and ping pong

Live feeding snakes is pretty fucked up too. Especially when frozen mice are readily available and any snake you buy from a reputable breeder will likely have been eating frozen rodents from hatching.

One is conscious cruelty and the other is natural instinct. Out of curiosity, how does one manage to become as shockingly stupid as you?

Untuck your nuts faggot.

I never heard the bit in the radio, so I have no idea if the person who was eating the mice was doing it out of "conscious cruelty". Regardless of intent the result is the same - and frankly I couldn't give less of a fuck about a mouse being brutally killed and eaten. If I'm shockingly stupid for that, then so be it.

The intent is the entire distinction, you dullard, and the results are very different. I can't believe you don't understand that a human is conscious of what they're doing and therein lies the cruelty, while an animal is incapable of conscious cruelty. The stupidity is mind boggling. Glad we can agree about your intelligence level.

All I'm getting from your post is that you're a tremendous faggot.

Yeah but you're a guy who doesn't understand the difference between a human and a snake eating a live mouse, so I'm not too concerned about your opinion on anything.

The mice are bred to be eaten, a different species ate it. I understand your point, but my whole point is who gives a fuck about cruelty towards feeder mice? You smug cunt.

I'd say most intelligent people care about unnecessary and sadistic cruelty toward other living beings. And you don't get my point at all, that's perfectly clear from your replies.

What you see as unnecessary and sadistic another person might see as a tasty treat. Just because we have the cognitive capacity to recognize the suffering of another animal doesn't mean we're not just another animal higher up in the food chain. Our factory farming and mass agriculture is fucked up on such an enormous scale that unless you're a vegan, you should probably shut the fuck up. Shit, even vegan food is tainted with the blood of innocent animals being ground up in massive combines - not to mention decimating habitats and ecosystems. So, go ahead and feel self righteous while I munch on some baby mice skulls as a snack, pussy.

Haha, look at yourself. Look at the nonsense you're spouting to try and justify a human eating a live mouse. How have you let yourself stoop to this level of foolishness?

But even in your silliness you're proving you're missing the key concept we're dealing with here, which is conscious intent.

even vegan food is tainted with the blood of innocent animals being ground up in massive combines

The difference of course is that the vegan human is doing everything they can to avoid cruelty. The idea that you think there's a moral equivalency between changing your whole lifestyle to avoid cruelty, and knowingly inflicting horrible suffering on a conscious being, with your fucking face no less, is laughably dumb.

Humans are horrible, have always been horrible, and always will be horrible. It's in our nature, and I accept it. I personally wouldn't eat anything that's still alive and would be disgusted to witness it - but I'm not going to go all PETA and get sanctimonious about some feeder mice when there's plenty more fucked up things to be appalled by. We're fucking savage animals even if you want to deny it.

You're very confused. You asked a (dumb) question and I answered it. This flight of fancy you've written has nothing to do with what we're discussing, and is clearly you attempting a massive copout.

I know you think calling it a "feeder mouse" is somehow a magical term that removes the human's conscious cruelty from the situation, but it's pure semantics that changes none of the facts.

My question is legitimate, and calling them feeder mice is very relevant. Humans specifically bred them to be food. If I feed a live mouse to a snake, regardless of the snake being driven by instinct, I'm still the one consciously sentencing it to be swallowed whole and slowly digested. So, what's the difference between someone being consciously cruel enough to do that using a snake (that was also bred specifically by us to keep locked in a tank for our amusement) or gulping it down themselves? Yea, it's gross to imagine someone doing that, but the end result is the same for the mouse and just as cruel. But we'll have to agree to disagree because I'm done arguing.

It doesn't matter what they were bred for, a human eating alive it is sadistic and unnecessary cruelty. A snake eating it is purely instinct. You're now so lost you're asking a completely different question, and inventing a completely different scenario. Even in light of this fact, you still don't understand that you are presenting a retarded argument? You literally asked what the difference between a human and a snake eating a live mouse is, got the simple and correct answer, but are now writing fan fiction about sentencing mice to die. It's hilariously ludicrous.

The fact that you fundamentally don't understand that it takes consciousness of the fact that you're committing cruelty for an act to be cruel is mind-boggling. Speaking to you is like trying to explain math to a dog haha.

Clearly you didn't understand anything that I said but somehow you take that as ME being the stupid one. You're an idiot.

I understand it all perfectly. Better than you do in fact.

When someone feeds a mouse to their snake they're conscious of it being cruel to the mouse, and in the end it's the same for the mouse regardless what organism is consuming it. What is so hard to understand about that?

Nothing. What's hard to understand is how you imagine it has anything to do with you asking what the difference between a human eating a live mouse and a snake eating a live mouse is. Which is what we are discussing, and which at some fundamental level you're incapable of grasping. It's simultaneously hilarious and fascinating. Like showing a gorilla a mirror for the first time and witnessing it's utter bafflement.

The whole time I was referring to mice being fed to pet snakes, not wild snakes hunting prey. Forgive me for assuming you would have gotten that when I referred to mice being sold as food in my original question, but I guess I should have worded it better. All my points stand, your whole point is that it's worse because humans are conscious of suffering, my whole point is those mice are only alive to meet a cruel demise and it's being consciously done by humans either way. Got it? Good.

Yet again somehow you have missed the entire point, which is actually almost an impressive feat this deep into it. Whether the snake is a pet or wild doesn't make the slightest bit of difference. It also doesn't matter what the mice were bred for or if he caught them in the alley. Your question was, literally, "What's the difference between a man eating live mice and a snake eating live mice?" I've explained to you with Christlike clarity and patience what the difference is, but due to some brain structure anomaly, or childhood trauma you're incapable of understanding the distinction.

Explaining simple realities to you is akin to explaining the feeling of lost love to a toaster.

So, the difference is your faggoty morality. I think I got it now - but the mouse still doesn't care.

Nope, the difference is one is conscious cruelty and the other is natural instinct. I'm sure the mouse cares deeply in either case, but that's not what we're discussing here.

I think I got it now

Haha, wrong again.

You're being intentionally obtuse and I can only assume you're just trolling me now. See ya around. 🐭🐍

Of course not, I'm simply answering your question. But the answer shocks and unnerves you for some reason, so you keep trying to pretend you were asking different ones. Not sure how you're this lost!

Jesus christ you guys are exhausting

I was hungover and it was making me laugh. Surprised anyone read this far down.

My question is legitimate

Yes, legitimately retarded.

You are a fucking pussy.

You really do not belong here, delete this shitpost, then delete your brain with a large caliber bullet.

We laugh about fucking kids here, you think we give a fuck about mice?

When someone feeds a mouse to their snake they're conscious of it being cruel to the mouse, and in the end it's the same for the mouse regardless what organism is consuming it. What is so hard to understand about that?