Milo selling out the gays, an addendum

0  2016-10-22 by aprosbro

[removed]

47 comments

"Do not stray from narrative or we will deny you personhood"

Progressives

Unlike you wonderful tolerant conservatives, right?

Ooops. Im not conservative. Never voted conservative, still wont.

So looks like your wrong

In this case straying from the narrative is convincing other gays in a country you dont live in that they should vote for the party that opposes their marriage, has made it a priority to federally protect discrimination against them, and believes they can be psychologically cured of their illness. Blow it out your ass, if Milo said gays should vote for Trump because he has the best tax plan jokes on me, Milo wrote on numerous occasions that the GOP was going to 'protect' gays and that the democrats havent done shit for them.

Go suck a dick with that alt right slogan bullshit.

It's not fucking complicated, even an obsessed low testosterone bed-wetter like you can, with assistance, hopefully understand.

Your dad's gay rights battles are all over. That was the fucking 80s. Last century. The legislation they wanted is on the books, the mainstream political culture has shifted sufficiently and anyone that wants to can get married or whatever.

So for the next decade what's the biggest existential threat to gay rights. Mass islamic immigration. Who's the only candidate that said anything about it. Right, so there you go fuckface. Milo thinks Islam is cancer, Trump says keep 'em over there till someone figures out who's who. End of fucking story. I told you. Not complicated. Just needs a few more gays chucked off roofs and eventually the establishment log cabin queers will catch up to Milo.

The fact you use a Saturday night to post updates on what some who gives a fuck Republican special interest group does or doesn't support reflects very poorly on you.

And if you ever again start a sentence with "Fast forward", I'll break your fucking fingers.

Fast forward to my statement right now, the GOP is explicitly interested in rolling back any and all civil rights progress the gays have made. They dont want them to marry, they dont want them to adopt kids, they dont recognize trans identities, they want to make it constitutionally protected to discriminate against them based on religious objection (you know, like radical islam.) Fuck you if you think the GOP is the party protecting gay civil liberties because they grossly and opportunistically plant a flag in a pile of dead bodies with nothing else to show for it.

The idiot left sold out the gays for their new brown islamic pets.

1970s style camp exotic gays were the left's poor tame pets in need of protection from evil white men (i.e. crude surrogates for the self-hating left's crippling daddy issues).

But the gays got too rich and successful and content to be the victims ... and if there are no victims, where are the victimizers that they needed to derive their faux moral authority from?

Right, so hastily reorganize the pyramid of victimhood. They chose to defend and embrace islam. islam says kill gays, it's in the fucking book. The left doesn't care. Never cared. It was always nothing more than cheap signalling for them.

They pretend to care about islam because it thinks islam is poor and non-white and defenceless. It's not. It's cancer.

It pretended to care about the working class, cos that was poor and defenceless in the face of bourgeois capital ... right up until the working class objected to unconstrained corporatist globalism hollowing out their children's future ... then the left called the working class stupid and racist.

The left pretended to care about gays cos the gays were weak and defenceless in the face of a couple of public-access TV southern baptist preachers or something. The gays did fine for themselves, didn't need looking after, and now some of them have gone off reservation. So the left will now punish the gays by importing savage inbred muslims to kill them.

You're full of silly. Pretending this is real how is it a better deal to form a paternalistic truce with the GOP where in return for 'protection' they have to forfeit all civil rights gains they've made in the last 30 years?

Terrorists have come from natural born and naturalized citizens, and they've tried to cross the other border, you know the one Trump isn't building a wall on. The GOP has no more power to protect anyone from terrorists than the democrats. So at least the gays get to keep their civil rights voting for Hilary.

Fuck all to do with terrorism or walls. You really are a day-late dollar-short not-getting-it last fucking century little boy.

Sharia law you clown. The 21st century is about nothing else but the defence of western enlightenment values against islamism. Pick a side you soft-headed tart. And make sure you pick right, or else it's the roof and a stoning for you.

The gays are the canary in the coalmine. They're the start not the end. Islam has a lot to say about non-muslims.

We just saw how quickly the feeble 19th century collectivists of the left sold out the basic human right of gays to not be killed for existing, they'll just as quickly sell out everyone else's rights and freedoms on the islamic altar of weak-willed tolerance and diversity and not wanting to look uncouthly phobic to their Guardian reading friends.

That is what this is all about. You need to sharpen up sunshine. Get your fucking head in the game. You squawking noisily about irrelevant 20th century party political battles already won, while you sleepwalk into losing it all. I'll be fucked if I'll let you sell me out.

Holy shit you're fucking retarded.
First, you squawking parrot, how is America going to be taken over by sharia law? Muslims are 1% of the population and aren't growing faster than most other demographics. Muslims who practice the kind of strict sharia that has you wetting your pants are an even smaller fraction of that 1%.
So how are these scary, scary muslims going to take over? They have little political power and are barely represented in the military.
Come on, now, loudmouth: explain in detail how the muslim boogeyman is going to take over America.
Or just type more paragraphs of panic like the hysterical housewife you are.
Moron.

islam is 1.6billion

Enough with the fucking leftist poor minority victim shit. That's a tired-out, go-to trope, that doesn't fucking work. Enough.

Mass immigration. Mass for massive. Pull your head out of the 1900s you lazy sack of shit. Describe Germany. Describe France. Describe Austria. Describe Sweden. Describe Southern Europe.

Describe Rotherham, Cologne, Paris. Describe the destruction to the social fabric and social cohesion happening now in countries unfortunate to be nearer the islamic cancer. Describe islamism, describe it's stated desires. Expand it through the brute force of wilfully engineered mass immigration, raw demography, and self-loathing shrieking white-guilt.

Project Germany 30 years from now. Even say 'fast forward' if you want to be a faggot about it.

This argument is entirely about the middle of the 21st century. You keep talking like the middle of the 20th century, and yet expect not to be humiliated and called a useless cunt for doing so.

Way to dodge the question, you bullshitter.
Your claim, you double-talking douchebag, was that the biggest threat to gay rights in America is scary sharia muslims.
So back up your nonsense with some facts. How are muslims threatening gay rights in America?

By the way, when I describe these foreign countries that have you hyperventilating, do I listen to the people who actually live there, or do I listen to ignorant bigots like you who get all your info from right-wing media and have no clue what you're talking about?

You are entirely full of shit about how gays were doing just fine and didn't need legal protections. Or would you be happy if you could be blocked from visiting your partner in hospital, or fired from your job, just because of who you sleep with?

So let's hear it, stupid. Back up your claim that muslims are the greatest threat to gay rights in America. Or just dodge the subject again like the pussy you are.

"tl;dr" was created for this sandpaper cunt davidfeynman. He types so much and says so little.

And who the fuck are you exactly? Sticking your nose in this far down the page?

The question was answered. Read the answer. Re-read it. Read it as many times as you need. Move your lips to sound out the words if you think that helps you.

On reflection, I do not like the use of the words that sharia is the "biggest threat" ... that implies competence. That implies that sub-retarded inbreds and rapists are capable on their own of jeopardising the apex of humanity: post-enlightenment western civilization.

Of course they are not. They are fucking backwards and useless. They will need help to do so, assistance offered-up to them by enabling self-hating white-guilt leftist faggots, looking to trojan horse sharia into the west in the name of "diversity". To proceed to hollow out the institutions and liberties of the west that both islam and the left equally despise.

You need to spend a week in Molenbeek. You need to spend a week in Rotherham. You need to spend a week in any of the European inner cities that have become crime-ridden, corrupt, sharia, no-go zones. Pick one at random. You are spoiled for choice.

Where do I live? You made an assumption here that was incorrect. Do not do that. I have the geographical advantage over you. I know explicitly what I am talking about. You do not.

You have a much too parochial, myopic, insular view of this issue for my taste. You need to sharpen up your ideas. You need working on boy.

islam is cancer. I am not proceeding further until you acknowledge that. Say the words shitdick, say it, islam is what?

Who the fuck am I? Who the fuck are you? Other than a lying cunt telling scare stories, I mean.

Squawk more about "sharia no-go zones" that Breitbart told you about that don't actually exist. Like their hilarious claim that cops are afraid to enter parts of London. Brits across the political spectrum laughed at this fear-mongering bullshit. But what do they know? They just live and work there, but you read an article somewhere so obviously you know better.

No, you dumb little bitch, you haven't answered anything. Explain how muslims are going to take over America. Explain how muslims are a greater threat to the rights of gays in America than you hate-filled right-wing douchebags. All you squawking housewives have is your scare stories. You can't explain how any of these doom fantasies will happen but we're all supposed to believe you anyway. You're the fucking cancer here, you lying sack of crap.

I fucking told you ... we don't proceed until you say the words you weak cunt ... islam is cancer. Say it.

Hahahahaha!!! Look at you! The random conspiracy-tard asshole thinks he gets to give orders!
Agreeing with your nonsense squawking would make me a weak cunt. So why would I do that?
Weak, you dumb cunt, is making a laughable claim that muslims are going to take over America, and then trying to weasel out of explaining how that would happen, like the coward little liar you are.

And when given the opportunity to call islam cancer, you can't.

A brutal ignorant repressed violent ideology that despises and abuses women, gays, children and non-muslims ... and a weak obviously bullied crybaby like you can't bring himself to describe it as such.

And that answers your fucking question. That is exactly how it comes to destroy any civilized society that it is allowed to fester in. Not by the force of its argument, but by the craven weakness of those that should know better, yet choose to tolerate and worse try to defend a hateful theocratic totalitarian cancer.

And you still haven't told me what country/continent I live in. Not the United States. Are you getting the picture you clueless fucking weakling cunt.

Servile snivelling little child. Get off your knees. It's a fucking disgrace, act like an adult for once in your miserable life. Now say it. islam is cancer

It really is the tactic of the dumbest of people to insist that I repeat your slogan. Does anyone, anyone at all, fall for your horseshit? I find it hard to believe anyone could.

So islam destroys any nation, does it? So that explains why Dubai is an international center for trade and finance? And explains why Turkey took in and saved hundreds of thousands of jews while nice Christian Europe was murdering them?
As usual, you braying right-wing jackasses are painfully ignorant of both history and current reality.

You have zero to back up your scare stories for children.
You have no way to explain how muslims are going to take over America.
You're a fake.
And a bitch. Talk loud, fail at backing up anything you're saying.
Loser.

Dubai and the UAE are a certified human rights disgrace. Brutal suppression and state sanctioned murderous disappearances of regime critics. A nation that treats women and foreigners like cattle.

Turkey, in the 1930s, you mean the secular Turkey of Ataturk, that abolished sharia and abolished the regressive islamic caliphate. That enshrined secular modernism as its constitution. The same Turkey that this year sunk back into the grasp of brutal inbred islamist slime.

Thus proving exactly that modern civilized nations can fall back into medieval savagery when cancerous islam is allowed to fester within.

You keep proving my fucking point you clueless fucking cunt. You had two hours. The current UAE shithole and 1930s Turkey were what you could come up with.

You are a fucking retard. You just proved it.

Now say it faggot. Say the fucking words. Say islam is savage and backwards and infects, poisons and attempts to destroy anything it touches.

Say the words, retard.

Boy oh boy are you dumb. That's right, you fucking moron, Turkey who has a secular government and a population that is still nearly 100% muslim. According you, that's impossible, right? Because muslims destroy everything. Way to fail to back up your own claim, you absolute fool.

I mean, does demanding people read from your script work on anyone? Ever?
Pitching a tantrum like you're doing is something most people grow out of before their age hits double-digits.
Holy fuck, the people unfortunate enough to know you in real life must laugh and laugh behind your back about what a delusional, angry little manlet you are.

This isn't a hostage video, dumbshit.
You're not in charge here.
And by once again failing to give any plausible explanation of your lie that muslims are going to take over America, you've proven beyond any doubt that you're a bitch. I see you trying to dodge backing up your loud talk. Keep showing everyone what a pussy you are.

Turkey had a secular government.

It does not have one now.

It had secularism. It had muslims. Now it has Erdogan and islamism.

The end is built into the beginning. Enough generations of sub-retarded inbreeding and enough child-fucking imams always ends up the same.

...

Hey faggot, do you remember that time you brought up 1930s secular Turkey in an argument about cancerous islam. Thus defeating whatever point you thought you could make. Do you remember, what a cunt you made of yourself when you did that.

islam is cancer. Say the words you weak-skulled bulliable cunt.

The more you post the more I'm convinced you're genuinely mentally ill.
Please post some examples of you throwing a fit and demanding people repeat your lines and it actually working.

If islam destroys a country, how did Turkey make it all these centuries? Are you under the impression that they were Buddhists before secularism?
And how about Malaysia?
Or Singapore?
Or Jordan?
All countries with significant or majority muslim populations. All doing quite well.
So squawk some more, you scared little housewife.

And hey, while you're ranting and screeching like the babyboy you are, how about backing up your claim that muslims are going to take over America? Because that was the lie you said first and you're running away from defending now. How is a tiny fraction of the population going to defeat the rest of us plus the entire military?
Go ahead, little bitch, back up your talk. Haha. You can't. You said something really dumb and you don't have the balls to admit it. What a little baby cunt you are.

Remember when you said 1930s Turkey?

Now say islam is cancer. Say it. Why can't you say it you creep. Do you like the idea of abusing women, is that it? You filthy fucking animal. Say the words, islam is what, say it.

Yeah, that's what I thought.
Talk, talk, talk but still no answer for how muslims are going to take over America. You're a pussy. Bye Felicia.

Say the words you filthy fucking animal.

Self-hating traitorous cunt.

Say sharia is cancer and say islam is cancer. Say those words, or say you tacitly approve the medieval ritual abuse and denigration of women as sadistic punishment by inadequate inbreds.

Say it. However, do not whatever you do, say 1930s Turkey. That will make you look a fucking useless cunt.

I don't think he should say those words. You're being kind of mean about it.

You play a lot of call of duty, huh?

No. Now perhaps explain what that's supposed to mean.

Or at least what you thought it was going to mean, in your head, when you typed it, how you expected that line to work.

Now, here's what it actually just happened. Unintended it marked the exact point where you ran out of snide supercilious Daily Show/Bill Maher/John Oliver current year audience talking points to unthinkingly regurgitate, the point where you were presented with an argument that puts islamic cancer into a wider 400 year context and a battle for the preservation of secular rational enlightenment values, rights, and liberties against rabid inbred theological violence - your petty facile sloganeering suddenly came up empty.

And like all good little bigots, when the argument turns, forget the argument, try to smear the opponent. Hence you end up saying Call of Duty for some reason.

You started this thread to show everyone how smart you were. You clearly weren't banking on running into someone smarter or faster, and you are not at all taking it well.

How about you go away for a week, and think about what happened here. How very limited you made yourself look, and I suggest you begin to question some of the paper-thin, safe, lazy, spoonfed mainstream assumptions you clearly rely on much too much. They have not served you well.

Didnt like the daily show, hate bill maher, dont watch John Oliver. You're just really far beyond the actual discussion at this point, the specific topic at hand, and you're really positive about a lot of really made up, smoking man, thermite paint type shit. You've expanded the context of the topic to include fantasy land, so it's just impossible to really respond to in a respectful, serious answer type way. So I maligned your viewpoint by implying you play a lot of video games and it really informs your world view. As if you were just screaming conspiracy theories and insults into some kind of group chat because it cant be linked back to you as a real life person.

Incorrect, again. No surprise.

This thread is about nothing else but ideologically-motivated islamic immigration into western society, and the directly unavoidable toxic impact such mass-immigration has on the protection of precarious rights and liberties of those who have have every entitlement to express justified concern about such a wilful and negligent ceding of western rights, values and freedoms.

Milo, and an ever increasing number of gays, have seen precisely how islam treats people just like them. You may regard them as being unreasonably selfish for not wishing to endure islamic violence, that's your problem, fuck off, deal with it.

The left sold out the gays. Milo did not. Your thread title is in gross error. Milo, and anyone in favour of civilized equality and liberty, does not want mass immigration from islamic cultures. The left does.

Read some fucking 20th century history. The left cares not for equality and liberty, it cares about authoritarianism. It tried and failed to get the working classes to upend western systems of liberty, it then retried and re-failed with the student classes. It now in desperation retries with crude violent demographics that it thinks it can later control and ameliorate. It'll fail. The question is, how much further damage will it cause in the attempt.

Mainland Europe is 15 years ahead of the States, and is a warning. Your refusal to recognise or understand that warning, to carry water for narrow establishment corporate and political self interest, is a disgrace. You should be ashamed of yourself. In twenty years time, when the social damage becomes undeniable to even the most soft-headed, and the survey is taken of what was lost, we won't find anyone that will dare own-up to talking as weakly and cravenly as you have done here.

Why does the GOP demand gay supplicance for protection, then? Thats just another kind of religious tyranny.

It doesn't. That answer your question. What did we just fucking say about your talking and failing in recycled glib bumper sticker talking points?

"he's the most pro gay GOP candidate ever" says your thread, and that constitutes a "sell out". No it doesn't. Gay wedding cakes and bakers don't fucking matter any more. Utterly fucking irrelevant.

Mass islamic immigration is the genuine, predictable, violent threat to gay rights. One candidate opposes it. The left, previously self-appointed protectors of the gays, traded them in for muslims. That is the fucking nauseating abusive sell-out you exclusively want to be concerning yourself with. Nothing else.

Big picture, sunshine. Much bigger picture.

Stop still talking about GOP or DNC as if that fucking matters here. As if that's still in any way fucking relevant. Trump isn't even GOP, that was Milo's point.

Stop talking in 20th century slogans and 20th century newspaper language, you look archaic. There is a fast-breaking new cultural geometry not based on those outmoded 20th century constraints. A new geometry that you rapidly, right here, need to get your lazy fucking head around.

This fucking argument, Milo's fucking argument, is fuck all to do with parochial indiscernible variations between two sides of the same establishment coin. The self-serving political classes, long since bought and sold by merchant banks, and you talking about GOP or PAC or fruity not-getting-the-point log cabins, looks utterly ridiculous in that context.

The themes, the threat, the solution is not based on anything you'll see on CNN. So why don't you stop fucking talking like CNN.

That's not his argument. Fast forward to after the election there are going to be real world consequences for the gays and it's very disingenuous to act like it's their duty to act outside of their self interest re civil liberties. And Trump has spouted plenty of distracting shit if Trumps soul purpose to to stave off sharia law in 15 years.

His argument was stated clearly: islam is cancer, and a deadly cancer if you are gay. Trump says no to mass immigration of islam.

islam is more dangerous, yields more "real world consequences" to gays in America than any presumed scarcity of gay baked cake products. Prioritise fucker.

That you've got this far down the page without this simple enough notion permeating that fucking malshapen skull of yours is a fucking disgrace.

You dont know which essays I'm referencing. I also dont presume to tell another group that their concerns arent real world consequences, that's pretty patronizing. Arent we in some 'the terrorists have won' stage here if we're happily sacrificing civil liberties for the illusion of safety? That doesn't sound particularly libertarian or whatever bullshit milo pretends to be.

Fast forward to after 8 years of Trump when we've presumably wiped out the threat of islamic terrorism with the help of Putin (another just stellar gay rights record in that ally) do you think the GOP is going to roll back all their regressive evangelical bullshit and suddenly gift equal rights to gays? No, that's laughable.

Protection of essential liberty is dismissed by you as sacrifice of liberty ... pure fucking Orweliian doublespeak that isn't going to fucking fly here. islam is cancer. islamism is incompatible with western values. Pick one. You are not having both.

The enlightenment values that we inherited are important, even though you despise the liberty and diversity of worldview they afford us, and they are worth defending against violent medieval theologies. I'll be fucked if I will let your vile cringing, self-loathing bed-wetters cheaply sell them out in acquiescence to savagery.

And then you're back to more spoonfed CNN talking points. They do not fucking matter here, they count for nothing in this century, stop wasting your cretinous time with them. We've read the emails that generated those talking points. We know who's dirty, who's bought and paid for, and who sold out who and for why.

That you consciously typed Putin in conversation with a grown adult, is a fucking embarrassment. You made yourself look every inch the gullible fucking clown you are when you tried that.

Putin isn't relevant?

Correct. Any more spastic questions that you should have figured out for yourself?

I think Putin is pretty relevant.

Once again.... not alt right... im classical liberal who hate progressive socialist bullies

Let me guess im "faux-news alt-reich blah blah commie binary argument bullshit"... Regular people hate your ideology , not just trump fans

Why would I call you a commie? Thats fucking stupid. I respect any gays that say I'm not a 1 issue voter and I pragmatically chosen the GOP because their positives outweigh their negatives. I'd never tell a person they're bad gays for that. Milo should've stuck to that argument but milo is a sensationalist piss bucket who wants to lie and pretend that because a terrorist killed gays and the GOP lies about being more equipped to deal with terrorists therefore the GOP is better for gays. Luckily the minority of gays that buy that is so small it doesnt even extend to the gays who are already republicans. Gays, Latinos, women - thank god the GOP doesn't understand how to refrain from horrifying all these minority groups we might actually wind up with one for president.

Twitter have killed him with that ban, I haven't heard a peep about him after the initial uproar

You DO know that "the gays" are a group of individuals with opinions all their own and arnt a collective to be bundled into one group and used for social engineering. ... right?

The statement by the log cabin republicans cites the 'one issues voters' thing. No they're not one issue votes, Milo made one issue statements dick bag. Also, Milo's civil rights are protected where he lives, it's a little hypocritical.

I pay Dalton Castle to spit in my mouth for sexual reasons.

We're all Dalton Castle boys here.

Milo is scum and should be raped full of AIDS

In this case straying from the narrative is convincing other gays in a country you dont live in that they should vote for the party that opposes their marriage, has made it a priority to federally protect discrimination against them, and believes they can be psychologically cured of their illness. Blow it out your ass, if Milo said gays should vote for Trump because he has the best tax plan jokes on me, Milo wrote on numerous occasions that the GOP was going to 'protect' gays and that the democrats havent done shit for them.

Go suck a dick with that alt right slogan bullshit.

It's not fucking complicated, even an obsessed low testosterone bed-wetter like you can, with assistance, hopefully understand.

Your dad's gay rights battles are all over. That was the fucking 80s. Last century. The legislation they wanted is on the books, the mainstream political culture has shifted sufficiently and anyone that wants to can get married or whatever.

So for the next decade what's the biggest existential threat to gay rights. Mass islamic immigration. Who's the only candidate that said anything about it. Right, so there you go fuckface. Milo thinks Islam is cancer, Trump says keep 'em over there till someone figures out who's who. End of fucking story. I told you. Not complicated. Just needs a few more gays chucked off roofs and eventually the establishment log cabin queers will catch up to Milo.

The fact you use a Saturday night to post updates on what some who gives a fuck Republican special interest group does or doesn't support reflects very poorly on you.

And if you ever again start a sentence with "Fast forward", I'll break your fucking fingers.

Once again.... not alt right... im classical liberal who hate progressive socialist bullies

Let me guess im "faux-news alt-reich blah blah commie binary argument bullshit"... Regular people hate your ideology , not just trump fans

Incorrect, again. No surprise.

This thread is about nothing else but ideologically-motivated islamic immigration into western society, and the directly unavoidable toxic impact such mass-immigration has on the protection of precarious rights and liberties of those who have have every entitlement to express justified concern about such a wilful and negligent ceding of western rights, values and freedoms.

Milo, and an ever increasing number of gays, have seen precisely how islam treats people just like them. You may regard them as being unreasonably selfish for not wishing to endure islamic violence, that's your problem, fuck off, deal with it.

The left sold out the gays. Milo did not. Your thread title is in gross error. Milo, and anyone in favour of civilized equality and liberty, does not want mass immigration from islamic cultures. The left does.

Read some fucking 20th century history. The left cares not for equality and liberty, it cares about authoritarianism. It tried and failed to get the working classes to upend western systems of liberty, it then retried and re-failed with the student classes. It now in desperation retries with crude violent demographics that it thinks it can later control and ameliorate. It'll fail. The question is, how much further damage will it cause in the attempt.

Mainland Europe is 15 years ahead of the States, and is a warning. Your refusal to recognise or understand that warning, to carry water for narrow establishment corporate and political self interest, is a disgrace. You should be ashamed of yourself. In twenty years time, when the social damage becomes undeniable to even the most soft-headed, and the survey is taken of what was lost, we won't find anyone that will dare own-up to talking as weakly and cravenly as you have done here.

Unlike you wonderful tolerant conservatives, right?