What is funny, though, is the memory of ol drunk Pop Pop Cumia riffling through his couch cushions screaming "Where's My Gun!" right after committing a felony or two. He's hardly a benchmark for responsible gun owners. If he was poor, he would be in jail right now making the fellas on his range laugh with his out-dated impressions and knowledge of forgotten sitcoms.
I'm sick of hearing it doesn't matter if he's right or wrong. And no matter what he's always again the black dude so sure sometimes he's gonna be right.
Well, BLM doesnt care about white people who were shot. The homeless dude in the desert in arizona got lit up by police AR15s becaude he punched the policedog. Thats unjustified. But if you listen to BLM youd think black people are put up against walls and shot. So thats why its always a black guy we hear about
No hes funnier than me. Unapologetic and caustic. The kicker is in real life hes probably not racist at all. He just seems to love to piss people off online
Eh, yeah he is. The penalty for resisting arrest being judge dredd style on the spot execution isn't something I think we should aspire to.
And while Ant and Joe (and their mother and their father) are not convicted felons, they are fucking admitted felons.
And I'm in favor of arresting and trying a person for illegally possessing a weapon. I'm generally in favor of due process. I'm also guessing you wrote this before that other black guy who had a gun legally got killed during a traffic stop for a 'broken tail light' aka wrong neighborhood.
That cop is the result of police cadets being bombarded with training videos of police getting ambushed at vehicle stops. Ive seen a couple of them and theyre scary shit. A trio of mexican drug runners slowly surround a texas ranger and get his gun, a vientnam vet crazy dude shooting a cop with a carbine and the cop is begging for his life and gets it in the head.
This dude is a high strung fuck who probably didnt even read the victims body language. And hes keyed up from the previous video making a stir
They need to stop scaring the shit out of these police cadets and also train them to run the fuck back to the car (the giant steel shield) instead of stand there and have a fucking quick draw.
How to invoke White Privilege even if you're not white:
You are not allowed to take two seconds to process a police request,
That's because it's not a request. It's a command. If you are taking time to process the "request" it's because you're considering alternatives to compliance.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to stand in fear deciding if you should run or face an officer who may or may not fire upon you for no reason,
If you're considering whether to comply or to resist arrest, you're non-compliant. Non-compliance could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to talk back to authority, you are not allowed to struggle ever.
Correct. You have to comply with police commands. Nothing you say to the police -- other than answering questions about who you are, etc. -- can ever help you in any way. Arguing or yelling at police is almost guaranteed to hurt your situation.
Struggling is stepping way out of line. Struggling could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
Resisting arrest is how lots of white people get shot too. So here's how to invoke white privilege:
when being approached by a cop, keep your hands visible.when police tell you to get on the ground you get on the ground.when the tell you to put your hands behind your back you put your hands behind your back.when cops ask you questions, either answer the questions politely or state that you're invoking your right to be silent.whenever the answer is either yes or no, say "yes sir" or "no sir".
Be advised that cops see the aftermath of lots of violence where both the aggressor and the victim are black. They encounter lots of angry black people who are antagonistic and who often attack them.
So if you want to invoke your white privilege -- you have to be obvious about the fact that you are not angry -- otherwise you could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
I'm not reading this, but police are confusing dick heads who are needlessly standoffish. I've never met a cop I thought should have a gun. My dumbest cousin is a cop because he wasn't smart enough to be a fireman.
Ant may be right about this guy rolling the dice, but I choose to remain ignorant of the story. I don't have to read, let alone comment about every time an officer shoots someone. He should take this advice and chill out, maybe watch some YouTube videos about cats
In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. "
No facts... just insults. You lost big time. Your position is emotional reaction to inconvenient facts. You should calm down and go look for shit to back up your bankrupt position and try to hoist me by my own petard.... but you cant because facts dont back you up.
Why are facts and stats bad? Because you dont have any... so your response is "racist". Ill shut up if you can use logic and fact to disprove me. But all you got is "cumia! Trump!"
A BLM leader does a day of police training and ends up shooting unarmed man for not complying (paintball gun)
Edit-- dont downvote without seeing it you intellectual pussy. Watch it and give a rebuttal. The dude shot an unarmed man and said the guy got too close to him.
You're being downvoted because it's a fucking stupid thing to say.
"This black person made a mistake during a training exercise after a few hours of practice".
Great - that means you can't learn to be a cop in one day.
Oh wait - you thought it meant "the cops are thus not racist and BLM are the REAL racists #alllivesmatter
I'm team #nolivesmatter but you are correct in that nobody can train to be an effective cop in one day. However, he didn't say something stupid, he said something retarded.
No i was pointing out the natural human reaction is to protect ones safety. While we want robocops, cops are mortal. Did he, or did he not have a gun? You would have shot him without a doubt. Do you think the race and not the active resistance coupled with having a gun was why they shot him? Cops shoot more whites than blacks so it has to do more with fear of harm than hate of race
In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. "
white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. "
So based on your link, assuming that's correct, cops murdering 40 unarmed black men a year in this country is totally acceptable and hilarious in your eyes and all of the protesters are just being babies.
I don't need to disprove those stats. 40 is enough to raise an eyebrow. And you don't understand how statistics work in the first place. You initially claimed "more whites are shot by police" because you don't understand what 'per capita' means, and you also don't acknowledge that racism is rampant in the justice system. Your entire basis for the shit you're saying is retarded and wrong.
Individual racists exist everywhere but there is no institutional racism. Show me the police training that says blacks are less than human. Point me to the laws that give black people less rights than everyone else. All you could do is point to some redneck cop on facebook being racist and rihhtly being fired and not a whole systematic oppression
Institutional racism is a pattern of social institutions — such as governmental organizations, schools, banks, and courts of law — giving negative treatment to a group of people based on their race.
But how is it institutional if there is every legal recourse allowed to blacks? If a judge is proved to be racially biased he gets fired. The Institution fires him. Black people can use the system to fight back against discrimination. Equal treatment under the law. How is it racist if ALL the rules and laws of said institution protect minorities?
If a judge is proved to be racially biased he gets fired.
No he doesn't, usually. Especially considering that it's not really something that's easy to prove.
Black people can use the system to fight back against discrimination.
Not so much - doesn't work too well if you're black.
Equal treatment under the law. How is it racist if ALL the rules and laws of said institution protect minorities?
The confusion here is that you're stupid enough to believe that the letter of the law is the exact same thing as the actual execution of the law. You are infuriatingly naive.
Well unfortunately the letter of the law is what we have to use because its the only way to fairly determine facts. Its why we have courts. The execution of the law can be biased but the citizens can appeal in several ways. If the execution of the law can be contested and have judgements overturned by using the system, then the system isnt racist... individuals within the system can be called out and fired. Thats the system being used to fight racism. So i ask again, how is it institutional racism?
If the execution of the law can be contested and have judgements overturned by using the system, then the system isnt racist...
The fact that there exists an appeals process does not prove the system isn't racist you fucking idiot. The appeals process largely involves disputing procedural / material errors during the original trial - you can't overturn a conviction based on a hunch that a judge is a racist. That's not how it fucking works.
individuals within the system can be called out and fired.
Yet when they get called out for murdering people, you side with Anthony Cumia, convicted woman beating racist gun nut.
So i ask again, how is it institutional racism?
Institutional racism is blacks being targeted for arrest more often than whites. It's when black people get pulled over for driving around in the 'wrong neighborhood'. It's when they get way longer sentences on average than white people convicted of the same shit from the judge. It's when a white guy can rape a woman behind a dumpster and get six months probation. It's a pattern. It's mind boggling that you don't understand this. You have this childlike notion that because there's no law specifically stating that black people should be targeted more and punished harder that it doesn't happen. You are the epitome of a trump voter - white, angry, racist, and completely fucking uneducated.
How is the dumpster rape kid related to this? Youre lumping in that because youre racist aga8nst whites. Why cant you show me stats proving a systematic oppression? All you have is your emotions. You say institutional racism is real but your only proof is "racist people exist" and "it seems blacks get arrested.more" The numbers say that yes blacks are more likely to get in trouble but why do you assume blacks commit crimes at a rate identical to whites and asians if UNBIASED stats disprove that?
The "pattern" you mention is your opinion that is not supported by facts. I disproved your "institutional racism" claim. You cant prove anything beyond the fact that individuals can be racist. But the system can counteract their biased actions rendering your point false.
Using your standards, I can say the NBA is institutional racism too if you think that outcome is ALWAYS the result of intent
Answer this question... is the NBA a racist institution?
Prison sentences of black men were nearly 20% longer than those of white men for similar crimes in recent years, an analysis by the U.S. Sentencing Commission found.
I doubt you'll bother to read it though, or you'll just cherry pick the quotes about why that's okay. It's from the WSJ, keep in mind - I wanted to give you a friendly right wing source that you wouldn't immediately dismiss.
but why do you assume blacks commit crimes at a rate identical to whites and asians if UNBIASED stats disprove that?
I don't assume that, and I never said that.
The "pattern" you mention is your opinion that is not supported by facts.
Yes it is. It's clear to anyone who has done any research on the subject outside of white nationalist internet forums.
I disproved your "institutional racism" claim.
No, you simply said that it doesn't exist, which is fucking hilarious and so stupid that you should have your dick snipped for even suggesting it.
But the system can counteract their biased actions rendering your point false.
And yet it almost never does, rendering my point totally true.
because youre racist aga8nst whites
Being a white person, I can definitely tell you Im not racist against whites. I just have a small amount of self awareness. It's also not white guilt either. I have zero guilt over the fact that I could probably get away with a rape even if there were witnesses and even if I admitted it. It's a pretty good state of affairs for me.
I never saw her and I never saw that movie so I don't know if that's funny or not.
Still, you should stop saying you're not a racist and that anthony isn't a racist and start explaining why racism is a positive force in the world. You can't be a negative nathan your whole life, racist name.
Youre comment on acceptability of black people being shot is a strawman. Right there. Who has stated that blacks be8ng shot is ok besides stormfronters?
How to invoke White Privilege even if you're not white:
You are not allowed to take two seconds to process a police request,
That's because it's not a request. It's a command. If you are taking time to process the "request" it's because you're considering alternatives to compliance.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to stand in fear deciding if you should run or face an officer who may or may not fire upon you for no reason,
If you're considering whether to comply or to resist arrest, you're non-compliant. Non-compliance could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to talk back to authority, you are not allowed to struggle ever.
Correct. You have to comply with police commands. Nothing you say to the police -- other than answering questions about who you are, etc. -- can ever help you in any way. Arguing or yelling at police is almost guaranteed to hurt your situation.
Struggling is stepping way out of line. Struggling could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
Resisting arrest is how lots of white people get shot too. So here's how to invoke white privilege:
when being approached by a cop, keep your hands visible.when police tell you to get on the ground you get on the ground.when the tell you to put your hands behind your back you put your hands behind your back.when cops ask you questions, either answer the questions politely or state that you're invoking your right to be silent.whenever the answer is either yes or no, say "yes sir" or "no sir".
Be advised that cops see the aftermath of lots of violence where both the aggressor and the victim are black. They encounter lots of angry black people who are antagonistic and who often attack them.
So if you want to invoke your white privilege -- you have to be obvious about the fact that you are not angry -- otherwise you could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
86 comments
13 stinkskc 2016-07-06
But who cares, who the fuck is asking him? Isn't he supposed to be funny? He's only psyched cause the dude was black
9 Jackatard 2016-07-06
What is funny, though, is the memory of ol drunk Pop Pop Cumia riffling through his couch cushions screaming "Where's My Gun!" right after committing a felony or two. He's hardly a benchmark for responsible gun owners. If he was poor, he would be in jail right now making the fellas on his range laugh with his out-dated impressions and knowledge of forgotten sitcoms.
3 panasonictooth 2016-07-06
He's about as funny as Joe now.
3 PhilipMarma 2016-07-06
Joe tries harder.
-12 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Did you say that during the Michael Brown controversy? Sure hes racist but like the title says... hes not wrong in this instance
1 stinkskc 2016-07-06
I'm sick of hearing it doesn't matter if he's right or wrong. And no matter what he's always again the black dude so sure sometimes he's gonna be right.
-9 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Well, BLM doesnt care about white people who were shot. The homeless dude in the desert in arizona got lit up by police AR15s becaude he punched the policedog. Thats unjustified. But if you listen to BLM youd think black people are put up against walls and shot. So thats why its always a black guy we hear about
3 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
No, they're pinned down to the ground by two men at once and then executed because the cops find it entertaining to do so.
-1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Carefull with that strawman, its flammable.
So they want to ruin their career and life for fun? I want to believe your just kidding but a lot of children believe that
5 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Stop saying strawman, you don't know what it means you stupid fuck. Take a fucking logic class before you try pulling out that crap.
White cops generally do not have their careers and lives ruined for murdering black people. In fact they usually get a nice little vacation out of it.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Strawman-- a sham argument set up to be defeated
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Its called debate class not "logic" class
Why do all the cops and their families have to go into hiding??
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
In the handful of times that's happened it's to escape justice.
1 bobbacklund 2016-07-06
Stop being such a fucking victim.
7 FootThingOnHisFoot 2016-07-06
Dude; got 4 years for underage banging when he was 20. Sold weed. Domestic abuse. Criminal damage to property.
Ant; bangs underage as low as 13. Sold coke. Domestic abuse. Criminal damage to property.
hashtag CouldHaveBeenAnt
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Lol close. But ant wouldnt resist. Its hard to resist when shitting your pants and crying
8 JunkerHQ 2016-07-06
Don't try to fit in ApeNia
-3 [deleted] 2016-07-06
No hes funnier than me. Unapologetic and caustic. The kicker is in real life hes probably not racist at all. He just seems to love to piss people off online
5 aprosbro 2016-07-06
Eh, yeah he is. The penalty for resisting arrest being judge dredd style on the spot execution isn't something I think we should aspire to.
And while Ant and Joe (and their mother and their father) are not convicted felons, they are fucking admitted felons.
-3 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Well, he did have a gun and was resisting. I dont think thats equal to summary judgment and execution. Cops dont like getting shot.
3 aprosbro 2016-07-06
Neither to unarmed blacks and that happens plenty, homie.
0 [deleted] 2016-07-06
P.s. he was armed
3 peckaface 2016-07-06
Yeah, but the real question is, was he legged? Tss tss
1 aprosbro 2016-07-06
And I'm in favor of arresting and trying a person for illegally possessing a weapon. I'm generally in favor of due process. I'm also guessing you wrote this before that other black guy who had a gun legally got killed during a traffic stop for a 'broken tail light' aka wrong neighborhood.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
That cop is the result of police cadets being bombarded with training videos of police getting ambushed at vehicle stops. Ive seen a couple of them and theyre scary shit. A trio of mexican drug runners slowly surround a texas ranger and get his gun, a vientnam vet crazy dude shooting a cop with a carbine and the cop is begging for his life and gets it in the head.
This dude is a high strung fuck who probably didnt even read the victims body language. And hes keyed up from the previous video making a stir
They need to stop scaring the shit out of these police cadets and also train them to run the fuck back to the car (the giant steel shield) instead of stand there and have a fucking quick draw.
-1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
How to invoke White Privilege even if you're not white:
You are not allowed to take two seconds to process a police request,
That's because it's not a request. It's a command. If you are taking time to process the "request" it's because you're considering alternatives to compliance.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to stand in fear deciding if you should run or face an officer who may or may not fire upon you for no reason,
If you're considering whether to comply or to resist arrest, you're non-compliant. Non-compliance could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to talk back to authority, you are not allowed to struggle ever.
Correct. You have to comply with police commands. Nothing you say to the police -- other than answering questions about who you are, etc. -- can ever help you in any way. Arguing or yelling at police is almost guaranteed to hurt your situation.
Struggling is stepping way out of line. Struggling could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
Resisting arrest is how lots of white people get shot too. So here's how to invoke white privilege:
when being approached by a cop, keep your hands visible.when police tell you to get on the ground you get on the ground.when the tell you to put your hands behind your back you put your hands behind your back.when cops ask you questions, either answer the questions politely or state that you're invoking your right to be silent.whenever the answer is either yes or no, say "yes sir" or "no sir".
Be advised that cops see the aftermath of lots of violence where both the aggressor and the victim are black. They encounter lots of angry black people who are antagonistic and who often attack them.
So if you want to invoke your white privilege -- you have to be obvious about the fact that you are not angry -- otherwise you could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
1 aprosbro 2016-07-06
I'm not reading this, but police are confusing dick heads who are needlessly standoffish. I've never met a cop I thought should have a gun. My dumbest cousin is a cop because he wasn't smart enough to be a fireman.
5 OKChaps 2016-07-06
I kept reading that as "convicted melon" and I was wondering "Who on Earth would every take legal action against a fruit?"
Then I re-read the sentence and boy did I feel like a silly goose. Honestly, I crack myself up at times, let me tell you.
2 drudrudrudru 2016-07-06
Ant may be right about this guy rolling the dice, but I choose to remain ignorant of the story. I don't have to read, let alone comment about every time an officer shoots someone. He should take this advice and chill out, maybe watch some YouTube videos about cats
2 stinkskc 2016-07-06
Exactly no one asked for his input except maybe Joe or another hanger on
2 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
You're wrong.
0 [deleted] 2016-07-06
In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. "
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000/
0 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart
-1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Nice factually based rebuttal. Feels over reelz huh?
2 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
Go back to being ApeNia, fag.
0 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Im waiting for stats...
2 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
You know who loves stats? Ant. You know who beats little boys up after pedophilically fucking them? Ant.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Facts are biased?
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
You lost. Your position has been exposed as emotionally based and therefore not logically consistant OR fair.
3 3stepsbackward 2016-07-06
You sound like a lunatic.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
No facts... just insults. You lost big time. Your position is emotional reaction to inconvenient facts. You should calm down and go look for shit to back up your bankrupt position and try to hoist me by my own petard.... but you cant because facts dont back you up.
2 3stepsbackward 2016-07-06
Replies like this are only solidifying my original claim.
0 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Seems like a cogent argument i made buddy. What do you have on your side? Name calling. You lose
0 ApeNia 2016-07-06
That isn't me. I'm enjoying watching him school you though.
Cuck.
1 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
I'M PAUL R NELTHSON
2 satsamsit 2016-07-06
ew
-1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Hey, if the shoe fits...
2 satsamsit 2016-07-06
then kick your boyish-looking girlfriend in the sternum?
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
I dont mean to digress but did she say it was a kick or punch? I bet kick because ant probably has sissy xanax shaky hands
2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
[deleted]
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Why are facts and stats bad? Because you dont have any... so your response is "racist". Ill shut up if you can use logic and fact to disprove me. But all you got is "cumia! Trump!"
4 [deleted] 2016-07-06
[deleted]
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Ok... fair enough sir...
1 TweetPoster 2016-07-06
@AnthonyCumia:
[Mistake?] [Suggestion] [FAQ] [Code] [Issues]
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
[deleted]
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
The guy whose name is redacted in red reminds me of half of this sub
https://i.redd.it/cv9ew2iexo7x.png
4 stinkskc 2016-07-06
Cool, go somewhere else
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yfi3Ndh3n-g
A BLM leader does a day of police training and ends up shooting unarmed man for not complying (paintball gun)
Edit-- dont downvote without seeing it you intellectual pussy. Watch it and give a rebuttal. The dude shot an unarmed man and said the guy got too close to him.
5 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
You're being downvoted because it's a fucking stupid thing to say. "This black person made a mistake during a training exercise after a few hours of practice".
Great - that means you can't learn to be a cop in one day.
Oh wait - you thought it meant "the cops are thus not racist and BLM are the REAL racists #alllivesmatter
0 iWhereSchortSchorts 2016-07-06
I'm team #nolivesmatter but you are correct in that nobody can train to be an effective cop in one day. However, he didn't say something stupid, he said something retarded.
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
No i was pointing out the natural human reaction is to protect ones safety. While we want robocops, cops are mortal. Did he, or did he not have a gun? You would have shot him without a doubt. Do you think the race and not the active resistance coupled with having a gun was why they shot him? Cops shoot more whites than blacks so it has to do more with fear of harm than hate of race
0 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Wrong. Try again.
Wrong. Try again.
0 [deleted] 2016-07-06
In a year-long study, The Washington Post found that the kind of incidents that have ignited protests in many U.S. communities — most often, white police officers killing unarmed black men — represent less than 4 percent of fatal police shootings. "
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000/
Youre begining to look less logical and more emotional
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
So based on your link, assuming that's correct, cops murdering 40 unarmed black men a year in this country is totally acceptable and hilarious in your eyes and all of the protesters are just being babies.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
What about the asian and whites? Why dont you care about them?
Do you have any stats to disprove mine?
2 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
I don't need to disprove those stats. 40 is enough to raise an eyebrow. And you don't understand how statistics work in the first place. You initially claimed "more whites are shot by police" because you don't understand what 'per capita' means, and you also don't acknowledge that racism is rampant in the justice system. Your entire basis for the shit you're saying is retarded and wrong.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Individual racists exist everywhere but there is no institutional racism. Show me the police training that says blacks are less than human. Point me to the laws that give black people less rights than everyone else. All you could do is point to some redneck cop on facebook being racist and rihhtly being fired and not a whole systematic oppression
2 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Yes there is, stupid.
That's not how institutional racism works.
That's not how institutional racism works.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
How does it?
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
But how is it institutional if there is every legal recourse allowed to blacks? If a judge is proved to be racially biased he gets fired. The Institution fires him. Black people can use the system to fight back against discrimination. Equal treatment under the law. How is it racist if ALL the rules and laws of said institution protect minorities?
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
No he doesn't, usually. Especially considering that it's not really something that's easy to prove.
Not so much - doesn't work too well if you're black.
The confusion here is that you're stupid enough to believe that the letter of the law is the exact same thing as the actual execution of the law. You are infuriatingly naive.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Well unfortunately the letter of the law is what we have to use because its the only way to fairly determine facts. Its why we have courts. The execution of the law can be biased but the citizens can appeal in several ways. If the execution of the law can be contested and have judgements overturned by using the system, then the system isnt racist... individuals within the system can be called out and fired. Thats the system being used to fight racism. So i ask again, how is it institutional racism?
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
The fact that there exists an appeals process does not prove the system isn't racist you fucking idiot. The appeals process largely involves disputing procedural / material errors during the original trial - you can't overturn a conviction based on a hunch that a judge is a racist. That's not how it fucking works.
Yet when they get called out for murdering people, you side with Anthony Cumia, convicted woman beating racist gun nut.
Institutional racism is blacks being targeted for arrest more often than whites. It's when black people get pulled over for driving around in the 'wrong neighborhood'. It's when they get way longer sentences on average than white people convicted of the same shit from the judge. It's when a white guy can rape a woman behind a dumpster and get six months probation. It's a pattern. It's mind boggling that you don't understand this. You have this childlike notion that because there's no law specifically stating that black people should be targeted more and punished harder that it doesn't happen. You are the epitome of a trump voter - white, angry, racist, and completely fucking uneducated.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
LOL. I hate trump.
How is the dumpster rape kid related to this? Youre lumping in that because youre racist aga8nst whites. Why cant you show me stats proving a systematic oppression? All you have is your emotions. You say institutional racism is real but your only proof is "racist people exist" and "it seems blacks get arrested.more" The numbers say that yes blacks are more likely to get in trouble but why do you assume blacks commit crimes at a rate identical to whites and asians if UNBIASED stats disprove that?
The "pattern" you mention is your opinion that is not supported by facts. I disproved your "institutional racism" claim. You cant prove anything beyond the fact that individuals can be racist. But the system can counteract their biased actions rendering your point false.
Using your standards, I can say the NBA is institutional racism too if you think that outcome is ALWAYS the result of intent
Answer this question... is the NBA a racist institution?
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Here's a start, from the WSJ
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324432004578304463789858002
I doubt you'll bother to read it though, or you'll just cherry pick the quotes about why that's okay. It's from the WSJ, keep in mind - I wanted to give you a friendly right wing source that you wouldn't immediately dismiss.
I don't assume that, and I never said that.
Yes it is. It's clear to anyone who has done any research on the subject outside of white nationalist internet forums.
No, you simply said that it doesn't exist, which is fucking hilarious and so stupid that you should have your dick snipped for even suggesting it.
And yet it almost never does, rendering my point totally true.
Being a white person, I can definitely tell you Im not racist against whites. I just have a small amount of self awareness. It's also not white guilt either. I have zero guilt over the fact that I could probably get away with a rape even if there were witnesses and even if I admitted it. It's a pretty good state of affairs for me.
1 ApeNia 2016-07-06
http://imgur.com/a/IgWMb
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Hahahahahahaha. Well done, whites!
1 ApeNia 2016-07-06
I know, right? Those niggers would have never learned what a wheel was without them.
Go whites!
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Yeah, except modern man originated in africa! That was almost funny though.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
[deleted]
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
Interesting - now what? Is that why Bill Burr's wife is an ape?
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
[deleted]
1 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
I never saw her and I never saw that movie so I don't know if that's funny or not.
Still, you should stop saying you're not a racist and that anthony isn't a racist and start explaining why racism is a positive force in the world. You can't be a negative nathan your whole life, racist name.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
Youre comment on acceptability of black people being shot is a strawman. Right there. Who has stated that blacks be8ng shot is ok besides stormfronters?
2 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
You flat out said you think it's both ok and hilarious. This is straight out of your own mouth, I'm not sure why you're even bothering to deny it.
1 [deleted] 2016-07-06
? Youre losing this debate and now youre lying.
2 Bick_Bickerson 2016-07-06
I'm not loying. You're loying, you said it.
1 3stepsbackward 2016-07-06
Can you make another alt account and reply to yourself again?
-2 [deleted] 2016-07-06
How to invoke White Privilege even if you're not white:
You are not allowed to take two seconds to process a police request,
That's because it's not a request. It's a command. If you are taking time to process the "request" it's because you're considering alternatives to compliance.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to stand in fear deciding if you should run or face an officer who may or may not fire upon you for no reason,
If you're considering whether to comply or to resist arrest, you're non-compliant. Non-compliance could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
you are not allowed to talk back to authority, you are not allowed to struggle ever.
Correct. You have to comply with police commands. Nothing you say to the police -- other than answering questions about who you are, etc. -- can ever help you in any way. Arguing or yelling at police is almost guaranteed to hurt your situation.
Struggling is stepping way out of line. Struggling could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
Hint: comply with the commands of police. That's what white people who don't get shot do.
Resisting arrest is how lots of white people get shot too. So here's how to invoke white privilege:
when being approached by a cop, keep your hands visible.when police tell you to get on the ground you get on the ground.when the tell you to put your hands behind your back you put your hands behind your back.when cops ask you questions, either answer the questions politely or state that you're invoking your right to be silent.whenever the answer is either yes or no, say "yes sir" or "no sir".
Be advised that cops see the aftermath of lots of violence where both the aggressor and the victim are black. They encounter lots of angry black people who are antagonistic and who often attack them.
So if you want to invoke your white privilege -- you have to be obvious about the fact that you are not angry -- otherwise you could frighten the man with the gun. Do not frighten the man with the gun.
If you frighten the man with the gun, there's a chance he might shoot you.
1 ihaveaholeinmyass 2016-07-06
We know duh.. We're all white here
1 Clibanarius 2016-07-06
You have -1 points on this post