Can't flim flam the zim zam.

Who cares?

Ant got WAY too involved with that horseshit. I'll even admit, he made good points on occasion in regards to the case, but fuck did it bring just about every fucking show in 2013 to a screeching halt. Its like it became a personal crusade for Ant, in a way he'd never been as committed to before or since.

He's an American hero

You mean the hispanic that shot a black and it was all the whie mans fault?

Casey Anthony was undeniably involved in her child's negligent death and the coverup thereafter, in the best case scenario. Ant is a shock jock troll.

This guy sounds awesome, you and your disavow nonsense can go take a hike (no offense.)

Zimzam did nothing wrong.

Blacklivesmatter

Snackpiesmatter

http://www.europeanbakers.com/Global/images/Products/europeanbakers/snkCakesDnts_4.5ozCherrySnackPie.gif

I prefer the lemon pudding ones. Never chocolate, though.

I am not big on sweets.

I got huge on sweets.

I don't care for you or your rhetoric.

All lives matter

See? "All" includes black and puts no race above another. Thats how not to be racist

Imagine for a second you are sitting at a table and the food is getting passed around. Every time the person before you gets the food, they just pass it right over you to the next person.

You speak up and say "Hey! I deserve my fair share." Another person at the table says "we all deserve our fair share."

Would you say that other person at the table is completely clueless and missed the point?

Are you going to tell me i had a big meal before (white privilege) and they are all hungry? (PoC)

Edit:: god you people love that asinine "allegory of the pizzeria" :)

Ugh.

Of course, you avoided the question. I can't say I am surprised.

Im diving RIGHT into it before and after you used that asinine tactic. You cant say blacks are oppressed by a racist system if the president is black, 2 attorney generals, countless representatives, senators lawyers teachers, millionaire bussinessmen.

It's a simple question, I'm not sure why you are so insistent on not answering it.

Whether or not you believe that the person saying it is actually "getting their fair share," by dismissing their statement by saying "everyone deserves their fair share" you simply show a complete ignorance of their point.

The question isn't whether or not they have legitimate gripes about racism. That's a much more complicated question. I was simply demonstrating to you the reason why calling it "racist" to say "black lives matter" does nothing but reveal how clueless you are about what they are saying.

If you don't even know what they are saying, it is a huge blunder to be so sure that they are wrong.

I know the arguement. Its childish. Black people are not systematicly oppressed. Putting black lives first is not racist how? Because of history?

Putting black lives first is not racist how? Because of history?

First, the saying isn't "put black lives first," it is "black lives matter." This is not the same as saying "white lives don't matter." This is what my example was trying to demonstrate to you, and apparently you missed it. Interestingly enough, you claimed to 'understand' it, one sentence before demonstrating again that you don't.

I'll try again a different way, in the example given above, is saying "I deserve my fair share" suggesting that no one else deserves their fair share?

Why say BLM isnt putting them first if you dont put other races too? Youll say "because you want to increase awareness of violence against blacks" right? Then why is the murder of an asian not needing attention? Because black deaths at the hand of police are greater youll say. Then i say theres a greater amount of crime in the black community and whites are shot more often then blacks.

Whats your next arguement?

Why say BLM isnt putting them first if you dont put other races too?

If you actually addressed the question I've asked you multiple times, then we could actually discuss this. You seem more interested in repeatedly attacking a strawman arguments I have not put forth. If you actually want to get a good answer to this question, and understand it, honestly answer the question I gave you. If you won't honestly answer that question, then you aren't interested in an actual honest debate. Your goal does not appear to be getting to the truth of the matter, but painting BLM movement as "racist."

Your allegory is too simple for this discussion. Im going to the meaning behind it. Your position is you believe BLM is valid because blacks need to be elevated "to equality" yes?

By avoiding answering the question, once again, you are admitting, consciously or not, that you have no interest in actually having an honest discussion about this. You seem to be happy in your own ignorance.

But, on that note, I never once made a comment about the validity or invalidity of the BLM. The world is not the simple, black and white place you want it to be. Instead of desperately trying to pigeonhole me, the non-intellectually bankrupt thing would be to approach my argument with an open-mind. But that seems to be too difficult for you and you would rather pat yourself on the back by repeatedly claiming you know what my argument is (you do not), so I won't my waste time any further.

Good luck with everything.

I didnt take your childish bait, got to the heart of your position showed it to be at best ill informed and at worst racist. You are slinking away like an intellectual coward saying im not being fair by not equating civil rights and race to a fucking pizza

Blacks are legal equals to whites. They get their "fair share"

You're really hung up on what the letter of the law is aren't you? It would be cute if you were 14 and not claiming to be a college student.

35... 4 years at UMass and employed in IT. Have a GF (who hates how feminism paints women as victims with no self agency)

Then your girlfriend is a stupid cunt too.

Aw.

Read this carefully, it pertains to your philosophy

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

C.S. Lewis

CS Lewis also believed on the authority of husband's over their wives so you're kind of proving my point. Also pretty laughable that a Christian author would decry omnipotent moral busybodies.

Good point, but i wont discount everything he does. (See my ghandi statement)

You got that right, buddy!

;)

Ugh. I wish Zimmerman shot you in the head, pal.

If i defended myself and the whole country hated me for it id act like an asshole too

[deleted]

I believe he did mention that a mistake may have been made

I believe he mentioned that a mistake may have been made

I believe he mentioned that a mistake may have been made

I believe he mentioned that a mistake may have been made

I believe he mentioned that a mistake may have been made

I believe he mentioned that a mistake may have been made

Fuck Zimmerman for killing sexy Trayvon.

Ant can't even see that he's a piece of shit.

Have Beavis_vs_theFeds ever noticed he's a piece of shit

I think Zimmerman gets a pass for liberal media faggots trying to make him out the be a white racist. The dude was neighborhood watch for fucks sake.

Have you ever admitted that trayvon martin was a piece of shit thug who assaulted GZ? Probably not. Go away cuckboi.

I can't wait until emperor Trump is our president.

I can't wait until emperor Trump is our president.

Cause he's totally going to do all of the batshit crazy things he says he will? It's cool, though. I'm also 10 years old and take everything at face value.

Keeping a secure border is craaaaaaaaaazy!

Which President Clinton will do, so long as there is enough money after the billions we will continue to pump into destabilizing the middle east.

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

Lol

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

Lol you support ol Hillary Clinton swollen thyroid.. Good luck with that. #noballs

Shillary does not stand a chance. Sorry bud....

You're an SJW

I got huge on sweets.

By avoiding answering the question, once again, you are admitting, consciously or not, that you have no interest in actually having an honest discussion about this. You seem to be happy in your own ignorance.

But, on that note, I never once made a comment about the validity or invalidity of the BLM. The world is not the simple, black and white place you want it to be. Instead of desperately trying to pigeonhole me, the non-intellectually bankrupt thing would be to approach my argument with an open-mind. But that seems to be too difficult for you and you would rather pat yourself on the back by repeatedly claiming you know what my argument is (you do not), so I won't my waste time any further.

Good luck with everything.