He should just tell the judge jail doesn't bother him and he sits around with his friends laughing at the court system because it has no impact on his life at all.

With that Bea Arthur haircut of his they'll be making him the tranny.

Maude Cumia

Yes, the simple things in life. My firearm collection. My high school diploma. My transsexual-virginity.

What high school diploma?

What transsexual-virginity?

What don't you understand?

Court today means internet rAgE tonight (from roughly 10:00PM until 5:45AM)

It's amazing that a person his age can even stay up that late after blue plate special at the diner.

It's amazing he hasn't mentioned that liver and onions doused in gravy is a reasonable alternative to steak.

Because nobody thinks that shit.

Old people do.

It's funny how Anthony is in court this morning and there's a lot less shit posting going on by that one weirdo right now?

A lot less shit posting by about 3 of those weirdo's. So is it Anthony? Or someone in his employ who probably drove him to court this morning? Or a hanger on or relative who had to show up at court for moral support for their benefactor?

I would guess one of them

Edit: he seems mildly retarded so I'd go with Joe. If he uses "copious" in one of his posts it will be verified.

Whoah this is strange.

Strange yet completely believable.

Joe is on tour we can figure out when he's preforming from the calander and therefore couldn't be posting

Is that the one who keeps mentioning you specifically?

Yep. It's two accounts

That's what I thought

What a coincidence....

What time does HLN and CNN cut to live coverage of this super celebrity, multi-billionaire's court appearance? I figured they'd have 24/7 coverage.

Even the NY Crime Report isn't covering it. Who? Exactly

You'll get better coverage on /r/opieandanthony

He's gonna celebrate tonight by drinking a keg of Guinness then fucking Sue Lightning's tranny ass so hard she'll be shitting cum for 3 days.

That sounds like a great day to me. Nothing wrong with that.

You're half right. Anthony is the receiver, not the giver.

This. Sue is an anal virgin.

What a waste of tits on a guy.

[removed]

There may be some kind of ban on the sites you linked to. I can NOT approve the post, no matter how much I try.

Edit - It's motherless. I know that's banned from Reddit

Removed the motherless link

Still not working. Copy and paste the edited post into a new one and see what happens

[removed]

I saw a video where it looked like she got fucked

Bud Light*

Anthony gets fucked.

When you turn 13 on Ant Court Day you get a free iPad from uncle Ant

Whose that stumbling down the hall?

Uncle Ant, Uncle Ant

Hitting women through the walls

Uncle Ant, Uncle Ant

Who's a guinea, drunk, and mad?

Starts with blacks and builds a rant

He fucks trannys

Here comes Uncle Ant

AH- GUUUUSSSSHHHH

13?? Ewwwwww Anthony wouldn't mess with a 13 year old!! Goddamn that is sick!! 13 is a granny to him!!

You know what, Dude...Ya got your felony assault charges, ya busted ribs, all ya friends laughin', BOOM!

Why don't you type LOL one more time OP you fucking ass clown. Bah I'm just being a prick, happy court day!

[deleted]

LOL

What about being up on apepper charges? tss tss

I'd bet it just gets another continuance.

This. Or dismissed outright because Tranth paid off that dumb whore.

On these type of charges they're brought by the DA not her so no out of court settlement with her.

Of course there is. He pays her off then she doesn't show up. No DA is going to ask for a bench warrant for some white trash whore who faked a broken hand.

There's a periscope video and medical records. You don't need her testimony. If they felt he were a real threat to the community they could pursue the case.

How do you cross-examine video and medical records?

It's a good thing you're not a lawyer.

Through medical experts and video experts. In fact, in instances where there video exists often the DA doesn't need to bring the victim as a witness. Example, do you think Chris Hanson ever testifies in the pedophile cases? The answer is no. The evidence is abundant.

Additionally, Dani could be compelled to testify by the DA regardless if she was "paid off" or not. She would have no 5th amendment standing to not testify. If she changes her testimony should could be charged and if proof of a payment is found then Ant could be subject to obstruction of justice and bribery charges.

Video experts? What the fuck are you talking about. Also the video proves NOTHING

I wasn't addressing this specific video. He asked how do you cross examine a video as if it can't be done.

Holy shit there's a lot of idiots in this sub

change your stupid username, faggot. and quit saying holy shit every other post.

Holy shit! You change your your stupid username FAGGOT! 👆🏻 another fucking idiot.

Holy Shit Holy Shit Holy Shit

These are the same people who post shit on facebook that isn't even close to being right but they act like they know.

[deleted]

Many were charged. So you're wrong. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2027147/Joseph-Roisman-acquitted-paedophile-To-Catch-A-Predator-entrapment.html

Now many of those cases were thrown out. Yet, I never claimed they would win the Chris Hanson cases and you never claimed they would lose them. But charged, yes, people were charged.

None were convicted.

Here's an example of "None" convicted. http://www.timesnews.net/News/2009/10/29/Hawkins-sexual-predator-sentenced-on-child-porn-charge

A guilty plea isn't a conviction. He pleaded guilty.

Again, none were convicted. Convicted meaning found guilty after a trial.

Are you a fucking retard? http://www.timesnews.net/News/2009/10/29/Hawkins-sexual-predator-sentenced-on-child-porn-charge here is his sexual offender registration. http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/TN00519316/Dustin-Mcphetridge.html Pleading guilty means you admit your guilt. You are then sentenced which is a conviction. The article states if convicted he must register as a sex offender. I've linked to his sex offender registration just so you have more proof of his conviction.

I'm not a retard. A guilty plea is not a conviction. Conviction means found guilty after a trial. Sentencing is not a conviction. The article makes the same mistakes regarding conviction or guilty plea that you are making.

http://thelawdictionary.org/conviction/

You cannot be registered as a sex offender without a conviction.

Your argument = rekt

No, that's incorrect. You can be required to register as a sex offender after a guilty plea.

Not according to Kentucky law 17.510. Not only does the person found to have committed a sex crime or crimes against a minor must register, register their home, and also submit a DNA sample.

Shame that Dustin is in Tennessee then.

And you're confusing consequences with procedures. Procedurally you can be convicted, plead guilty, enter into an alternative disposition, be adjudicated delinquent and probably a half-dozen other outcomes. Consequently you would be required to register as a sex offender.

No jury ever came back with a finding of guilt against one of the To Catch a Predator people. Not a single one. That is the point you appear to be missing.

Dustin is from Tennessee yet he was arrested in Kentucky. If he had been in Tennessee you'd still be wrong because as soon as you plead guilty you are considered "convicted" per TN Code 42-39-202.

A guilty plea accepted by the court counts is a conviction. You can even be convicted by a judge. You do not need a jury to find you guilty to be "convicted". You are "convicted" before you are sentenced because the sentence comes from a finding of guilt.

I've provided you multiple sources. I've debunked your claims several times. Now you are trying to change what you said which was "no one" was convicted which is absolutely untrue.

You have to register where you live, which is why any Kentucky statute requiring registration while living in Kentucky is inapplicable.

Counting as a conviction is not the same as a conviction. You are still confusing consequences with procedures.

No one from To Catch a Predator has been found guilty by a jury. That is what conviction means - to be found guilty by a jury. That is the sum total of my statement above, and it is a true statement. I am not changing anything. You are simply too dense to understand the difference.

You can't be found guilty by a judge of a registration offense in any jurisdiction I'm aware of. These aren't traffic tickets.

You need to start reading the shit I cite. The Tennessee law covers convictions in other states. https://www.tn.gov/assets/entities/tbi/attachments/2015_Sex_Offender_Law.pdf TL/DR he must register and the conviction in KY is recognized as such.

No you are wrong. A judge is who convicts not a jury. You can be tried in front of only a judge it's called a bench trial. Also a judge can set aside a jury's decision it's called jury nullification. Plea agreements can still result in a conviction and a jury is not involved in plea agreements at all.

You are more wrong than two little boys fucking each other.

Everything you wrote is wrong. All of it.

Whatever dude.

I've never encountered anyone as ignorant of the law as you. You appear to have received all your legal training from episodes of Cop Rock.

I've provided citations and backed up what I said with facts. You spout nonsense and I proved you wrong several times.

You've done no such thing. You are fucking retarded.

Yep keep talking. You just sound like a dipshit.

Ahhhhhh.... but you said charged not convicted. More examples of people CHARGED http://migration.kentucky.gov/newsroom/aag/stingoct2007.htm in 2006 Hanson claimed 184 men were charged due to To Catch A Predator and he gives examples. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14817741/#.Vur0_9BSQ8U

I never said charged. That was the Soda Rapist. Plenty were charged. Plenty pleaded out. Only one went to trial and the case was dismissed halfway through.

You're right it was PepsiColaRapist who said charged.

Damn really? Interesting didn't know that

[deleted]

I've already cited a case that a suspect was charged. It's totally contrary to your statement. In Ohio they even deputized the crew so so the sting could be in line with ohio laws.

[deleted]

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/14817741/#.Vur0_9BSQ8U and http://migration.kentucky.gov/newsroom/aag/stingoct2007.htm

Want me to provide you the cases where there were convictions too?

[deleted]

That's why they stopped doing them, not just because of the loser who offed himself.

Once the first few got off, the precedent was set, and even the shittiest public defender could get the charges dropped.

[deleted]

No you were wrong. They were charging them. There were even convictions. However once the court declared it entrapment there was now a thing called precedent so it made continuing it in many states moot. Again, you said "half were not charged" well I have provided evidence that over 180 were charged.

[deleted]

He gave examples of those 184. You can look them up. http://www.bgdailynews.com/news/police-news-second-man-pleads-in-online-sex-sting-case/article_f7471a04-c128-58df-af95-4300629fe959.html http://www.insideprison.com/sex-offender-profile.asp?last_name=RESTOCRUZ&first_name=ROLANDO&city=hinesville&state=GA&county=liberty&id=14914 So again, there were convictions. And this was JUST a random look up of names.

[deleted]

I don't know the numbers. You don't know the numbers. What I do know is when I randomly search the names when they're provided by sources I find charges, pleas, and convictions prior to the acquittal in Texas. After the acquittal there were less uses of To Catch A Predator so the combination of both strongly suggests you are wrong.

You're an idiot, fuck off.

Don't mind SlappyJiggler guys he's just got a little sand in his vagina.

No, that's incorrect. Hanson didn't testify in Roisman's case because Hanson didn't do anything. Hanson wasn't part of the messages that induced Roisman to show up, that was the people at Perverted Justice. Hanson didn't make the video of Roisman at the house for sex, that was the people at Dateline. Hanson was not the victim of Roisman's alleged behaviour. Hanson made no substantive statements that would go to prove an element of the crime. There was no need to call him.

The video in no way shows Tranth breaking the Whore's hand or ribs. The only evidence that exists he did that would be the Whore's word. If she does not appear to testify the case would be dismissed.

She could be compelled to testify, that's true. The way to compel her to testify is to issue a warrant to bring her into custody, which I addressed above. No one cares enough about this "non-trial of the white-trash century" to issue such a warrant. It's not the OJ case.

And she certainly does have the 5th Amendment right to shut up. This isn't England. And she's offered no testimony that I'm aware of. If there's proof Tranth bought her off he could be charged with something, but that's a difficult case to prove and virtually impossible if everybody keeps their yaps shut.

Your last paragraph is the point. It's not a big enough issue to compel her to testify. It's not a case of him buying her off.

Tranth buying the Whore off is why she won't show up to testify in the first place. Well that and she's a lying whore.

Why pay off a lying whore when you can get her on the stand and prove shes a liar?

Paying her off is a certainty he won't be convicted. There's always a chance, even if it's only a very small chance, that someone will believe a lying whore and find him guilty.

So Tranth's choices are essentially:

1. 100% certainty for $100k to make the Whore go away (I don't know the actual number Tranth paid, just using that as an example) or

2. A 20% chance (just making up a percentage, I don't know how believable the Whore can look at trial) of losing and being a convict with a record and no more guns and probably probation where you can't drink or abuse Xanax and still having to pay the Jew lawyers $20k.

Which would you choose?

An acquittal looks better than charges being dropped.

Only to the uninformed. An acquittal means Tranth isn't guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. A withdrawal or dismissal of the charges means they don't even rise to the level of prima facie.

And they probably can't show her medical records without her there because of privacy laws. If there is no evidence of a broken hand, and that was her injury claim, that leaves a lot of doubt.

Good point. And even if the medical records came in and prove a broken hand if she doesn't testify that Tranth was the one who broke her hand then there's no evidence Tranth broke her hand.

Cross-dress it and Ant will examine the shit out of it.

the police show up as witnesses. this case doesn't just go away, it's the state of ny vs. anthony. dani has nothing to do with the case anymore other than being the victim. the state always pursues charges in dv cases.

http://family.findlaw.com/domestic-violence/can-the-victim-drop-domestic-violence-charges.html

What do you think the police witnessed that they can testify to?

The state does not always pursue charges in domestic violence cases, that's nonsense.

they testify about what she told them. my friend had a dv case. his ex didn't show up but the police who made the arrest and report showed up. the cops word is as good as the victims.

and i should have said dv cases with evidence, obviously not all cases are true, but if there is evidence they will pursue even without the victim

I have no idea the details of your friend's case but in Tranth's case any police testimony about what the Whore told them is hearsay and would not be allowed as substantive evidence to convict the Man-Child.

Look, Anthony would have bragged about it today on TACS if it got dropped. He hasn't addressed it so it was probably just another continuance.

Yes, it is likely it got pushed back, I posted that same thought earlier in this threak.

Ah, my bad.

It is alright, I pardon you.

it feels like every day is Ant Court Day

Ant's court day, St Paddys day, and March Madness starting. This is the best day ever.

He should do some standard impersonations for the judge. Then have Vince McMann fire him.

Instead of a St. Patrick's party, my shindig tonight will have an Anthony Court Day theme. The boys are showing up dressed like girls, the girls are showing up in naughty schoolgirl attire, everyone will be brandishing firearms, and the festivities will culminate with a ****** being beaten, lynched, and set on fire. Also, my hanger-on brother's shitty R.E.M. cover band "M.E.R." will be performing.

What time's it starting?

Erin Go Bragh

[deleted]

Is someone going to go to the courthouse and tell us what happens?

We need an on-scene reporter! Quick, what's Pat Battle doing?

Doesnt that shit happen early? Is it over? Wha happun?

Is there a TACS episode today? It should be on the air now. If Tranth was let go free he should be on air celebrating

He's tweeting, I guess he's out.

What black crime statistics has he tweeted so far?

He's tweeting pictures of Beavis. No crime reports yet.

Is Beavis in an orange jumpsuit?

No, that would be Maude Cumia.

He's been Tweeting most of the afternoon. I guess they allow phones in the court room, if he actually went.

He better be paying attention instead of dicking around on twitter.

With all of the "lols" are you supposed to be Jims new character? Forget his name....

He has no history of violence and none of the earmarks of a physically abusive person and i have major doubts that he did it. That being said i hope this hypocritical, twitter-follower-buying, lying, piece of dogshit fag fucking methusela gets passed around from cell to cell wearing make-up and a wig because his "black daddy" lost a card game

He has the earmarks alright:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ezr4EOqp6Cc

HAHAHAHAHA Look how Trant drunkenly stumbles into the back wall after abusing that tard dummy!

Thats just normal bobo hate... the pope would push him down stairs if he could

I've already cited a case that a suspect was charged. It's totally contrary to your statement. In Ohio they even deputized the crew so so the sting could be in line with ohio laws.

That's why they stopped doing them, not just because of the loser who offed himself.

Once the first few got off, the precedent was set, and even the shittiest public defender could get the charges dropped.

[deleted]

I've never encountered anyone as ignorant of the law as you. You appear to have received all your legal training from episodes of Cop Rock.

It's amazing he hasn't mentioned that liver and onions doused in gravy is a reasonable alternative to steak.