It isn't exactly, but it shows the same kind of dishonesty, saying "we" to signify "not me," making a proclamation about or demand on others in the form of a lie about yourself.
That's the irritating nucleus of everything that gets called "SJW," from Ivy League kids demanding that "privileged" others be forced to kowtow in their presence, to Louis and his new problem-glasses fans sharing a yeah fuck those guys about "white people," to...
You know the thing. What it's called isn't important.
Oh great, Sober-Jimmy is going to be replaced by my new least favorite character Gun-Control Jimmy... Please pontificate (blink a whole bunch while doing so) and tell us how to fix this problem oh wise James Norton.
It isn't exactly, but it shows the same kind of dishonesty, saying "we" to signify "not me," making a proclamation about or demand on others in the form of a lie about yourself.
That's the irritating nucleus of everything that gets called "SJW," from Ivy League kids demanding that "privileged" others be forced to kowtow in their presence, to Louis and his new problem-glasses fans sharing a yeah fuck those guys about "white people," to...
You know the thing. What it's called isn't important.
13 comments
8 PeckaSucka 2015-12-04
I don't think this is SJW shit.
5 QuantumTabby 2015-12-04
It's not. A lot of dummies in this sub equate "SJW" with "liberal".
-3 Pat_Battle_Storage 2015-12-04
It isn't exactly, but it shows the same kind of dishonesty, saying "we" to signify "not me," making a proclamation about or demand on others in the form of a lie about yourself.
That's the irritating nucleus of everything that gets called "SJW," from Ivy League kids demanding that "privileged" others be forced to kowtow in their presence, to Louis and his new problem-glasses fans sharing a yeah fuck those guys about "white people," to...
You know the thing. What it's called isn't important.
2 baraksobamas 2015-12-04
Being a cunt?
6 Really_Big_Dummy 2015-12-04
hardly, you're obviously just a lunatic so far right that this very mild statement seems far off and crazy
5 bluscreened 2015-12-04
If anything it's proof he needs to be with Ant on TACS to balance out Ant.
3 carribbeanjimmy 2015-12-04
Oh great, Sober-Jimmy is going to be replaced by my new least favorite character Gun-Control Jimmy... Please pontificate (blink a whole bunch while doing so) and tell us how to fix this problem oh wise James Norton.
1 Really_Big_Dummy 2015-12-04
this comment reads like its Jim Norton's internal dialogue
2 Mitchull 2015-12-04
Jesus Christ, you fucks finally slacked off the SJW crusade awhile back and here we are again with multiple posts whining about SJWs. Stop crying.
1 [deleted] 2015-12-04
[deleted]
1 rrussom 2015-12-04
this isnt SJW shit, this is just typical liberal shit.
when he starts saying shit like death to the white cis male and that freedom of speech should be taken away, then he's an SJW.
0 pitstained 2015-12-04
What's the problem here? Go back to TACS you fat, uneducated trucker.
-3 dirkbungler 2015-12-04
Jimmy should worry about controlling his fucked up sexually urges instead of worrying about what other people do.
1 [deleted] 2015-12-04
[removed]
-3 Pat_Battle_Storage 2015-12-04
It isn't exactly, but it shows the same kind of dishonesty, saying "we" to signify "not me," making a proclamation about or demand on others in the form of a lie about yourself.
That's the irritating nucleus of everything that gets called "SJW," from Ivy League kids demanding that "privileged" others be forced to kowtow in their presence, to Louis and his new problem-glasses fans sharing a yeah fuck those guys about "white people," to...
You know the thing. What it's called isn't important.
5 QuantumTabby 2015-12-04
It's not. A lot of dummies in this sub equate "SJW" with "liberal".