To think I used to wash his balls. He is letting his real fans down.
I don't even recognize this Anthony anymore, I am a listener since WNEW, not one you new fucking fruits, Louie or Patrice worshippers that infiltrated this sewer, so I am qualified to make this assumption.
Anthony, get the fuck off of twitter, it is ruining you.
It was probably a self-fulfilling prophecy, but a part of Anthony's soul died when he was fired. He feels victimized by the SJW's out there, and it's hard to be funny when you feel like a victim. That is why he's been a SJWW (social justice warrior warrior) ever since and not a comedian.
On WNEW, he didn't even say he was a republican until the Bush/Gore election when he said he was voting for Bush. I remember because I think it was the first time as a kid that someone I thought was funny said they were a republican
It's hilarious how the same people who yell about people needing to have thicker skin always respond to criticism with "What, so I can't say xxxxx?"
They just don't seem to be able to differentiate being yelled at back from the idea that they "can't" say what they're saying. It makes them such little victim-wannabe pussies.
But you literally can't say it when the punishment for saying it means you get fired from your job. If that's the case, then we have a de facto ban on free speech. Doesn't matter if the government allows it.
This is a decent point, particularly when people who don't even listen/watch something threaten the sponsors or the platform.
The thing is, Ant is his own platform now, and his "sponsors" are unthreatenable. The only form of "intolerance" he's subject to is people not wanting to listen anymore, which is completely valid.
What? Ant can't tolerate anyone's opinion that is contrary to his. If someone tweets him something that he can't agree with, he will engage in an argument with them straight away, trying to change their mind or prove them wrong.
What? Ant can't tolerate anyone's opinion that is contrary to his. If someone tweets him something that he can't agree with, he will engage in an argument with them straight away, trying to change their mind or prove them wrong.
That's not really what intolerance means. Blocking people and calling them liberal fuckheads would be intolerance (which he also does, so you could have just gone with that).
Ant was making a point in that tweet about his viewpoints not being tolerated, despite the fact that he is intolerant of anyone who's views don't align with this.
That was my only point - the hypocrisy of what he was saying.
Ant getting into it with callers was normally great to listen to, regardless of whether I agreed with him or not.
I don't think it's the same thing. When he disagrees with someone, he argues with them. When someone disagrees with people like him, they try to figure out a way to name and shame them.
Being intolerant of others opinions, would be to block, try to get fired, or tell them to shut up. Arguing is literally tolerating the others opinion and trying to counter it
No. Tolerating would be to just let other people's opinions be and to allow those people to have those opinions unchallenged. Trying to counter something is, by definition, not tolerant.
Ant is not tolerant of other people's views yet he tweets about he his views aren't tolerated. Either you're a blind Ant-follower who can't accept any hypocrisy on his part, or you're just not intelligent enough to grasp what basic words and actions mean. So, here you go, pay attention now...
tolerate
/ˈtɒləreɪt/
allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one dislikes or disagrees with) without interference.
..."without interference" is the part I'm referring to in case you couldn't grasp that either.
No. Tolerating would be to just let other people's opinions be and to allow those people to have those opinions unchallenged. Trying to counter something is, by definition, not tolerant.
That's absolutely not what tolerance means, particularly when it comes to tolerance of opinions. If a debate is held on a college campus, both opinions are being "tolerated" insofar as they are being permitted to make their case.
Or are you suggesting that whenever anyone attempts to persuade someone or engage in a discussion, they are being intolerant?
Wait so having an opposing opinion is interfering with the initial opinion? If Ant was intolerant of other people's views he would interfere by shouting them down(O'Reilly style), trying to have them silenced, or blocking their views all together. If I tell you that "The one and true God will punish you for your sins." and you respond with "No, that isn't how that works" You aren't being intolerant, you are disagreeing. SJWs pull the intolerant card
I'll repeat from an earlier post about much the same. an excerpt from a creative meeting at Casa de Cumia
""Is there some controversy here? Will this get the blogosphere a yappin? Will they put me on Hannity for this crazy tweet? Everything offends me/nothing offends me. This is an outrage. It's no big deal. Hello! Notice me! My income depends on it! I'll say anything!"
He's learning quick from cheesedick Gavin and in the process losing all the remaining shreds of authenticity.
PS: the Opester is still a cornball, legit retarded person too. "Hate" (or in my casethe dissapointment of watching the slow death of something once great) is not mutually exclusive.
what the actual fuck are you talking about? anthonys twitter hasnt changed in 6 years. he posts some pics of the tv show hes watching, then wars with lefties. i dont find comics on twitter funny anyway, so i dont give a shit what he does myself.
I'm not sure...but it seems that this sub apparently doesn't like Ant's political and social views. Better start another 10 posts all saying the same things to complain about a guy saying the same things.
Being intolerant of others opinions, would be to block, try to get fired, or tell them to shut up. Arguing is literally tolerating the others opinion and trying to counter it
What? Ant can't tolerate anyone's opinion that is contrary to his. If someone tweets him something that he can't agree with, he will engage in an argument with them straight away, trying to change their mind or prove them wrong.
That's not really what intolerance means. Blocking people and calling them liberal fuckheads would be intolerance (which he also does, so you could have just gone with that).
61 comments
20 AntsCamera 2015-06-28
Anthony is turning into a bigger cunt every day.
To think I used to wash his balls. He is letting his real fans down.
I don't even recognize this Anthony anymore, I am a listener since WNEW, not one you new fucking fruits, Louie or Patrice worshippers that infiltrated this sewer, so I am qualified to make this assumption.
Anthony, get the fuck off of twitter, it is ruining you.
39 Jockel76 2015-06-28
You sound like a hipster.
25 Genericscreen 2015-06-28
He was a listener before it was cool
10 prtyflkjdie 2015-06-28
ew, go practice that speech infront of a mirror, faggot.
6 Patmcpsu 2015-06-28
It was probably a self-fulfilling prophecy, but a part of Anthony's soul died when he was fired. He feels victimized by the SJW's out there, and it's hard to be funny when you feel like a victim. That is why he's been a SJWW (social justice warrior warrior) ever since and not a comedian.
2 xxmikekxx 2015-06-28
On WNEW, he didn't even say he was a republican until the Bush/Gore election when he said he was voting for Bush. I remember because I think it was the first time as a kid that someone I thought was funny said they were a republican
1 Viking_Lordbeast 2015-06-28
You don't have to be a fan for very long to realize this.
-5 I_Hate_Knickers 2015-06-28
It's what happens to pardon hikes when they get old. Apparently the predictive text doesn't do paedophiles!
9 VladiRad 2015-06-28
Heavy burtation
19 xxmikekxx 2015-06-28
It's just a circular thing
A: this is my opinion B: that is the opinion of an asshole A: don't censor me! Free speech B: but it's free speech to call you an asshole
The Internet is just constant version of that same conversation over & over again
14 packitchofsositch 2015-06-28
It's hilarious how the same people who yell about people needing to have thicker skin always respond to criticism with "What, so I can't say xxxxx?"
They just don't seem to be able to differentiate being yelled at back from the idea that they "can't" say what they're saying. It makes them such little victim-wannabe pussies.
6 Spokker 2015-06-28
But you literally can't say it when the punishment for saying it means you get fired from your job. If that's the case, then we have a de facto ban on free speech. Doesn't matter if the government allows it.
12 panjshirlion 2015-06-28
This is a decent point, particularly when people who don't even listen/watch something threaten the sponsors or the platform.
The thing is, Ant is his own platform now, and his "sponsors" are unthreatenable. The only form of "intolerance" he's subject to is people not wanting to listen anymore, which is completely valid.
1 [deleted] 2015-06-28
[deleted]
1 onemancrimespree 2015-06-28
It's not about saying shit. It's the actions that follow the shit that's said.
16 DoubleGuns 2015-06-28
What? Ant can't tolerate anyone's opinion that is contrary to his. If someone tweets him something that he can't agree with, he will engage in an argument with them straight away, trying to change their mind or prove them wrong.
The hypocrisy is laughable on both parts.
4 panjshirlion 2015-06-28
That's not really what intolerance means. Blocking people and calling them liberal fuckheads would be intolerance (which he also does, so you could have just gone with that).
2 Spokker 2015-06-28
Yeah, on the radio he should have always said, "I respect your opinion and we'll leave it at that" while dead air fills the airwaves.
The arguing and trying to prove someone wrong is what drives the discussions, whether it's on the radio or Twitter or whatever.
2 DoubleGuns 2015-06-28
Ant was making a point in that tweet about his viewpoints not being tolerated, despite the fact that he is intolerant of anyone who's views don't align with this.
That was my only point - the hypocrisy of what he was saying.
Ant getting into it with callers was normally great to listen to, regardless of whether I agreed with him or not.
How did you get that from what I said?
0 Spokker 2015-06-28
I don't think it's the same thing. When he disagrees with someone, he argues with them. When someone disagrees with people like him, they try to figure out a way to name and shame them.
1 lickitoff 2015-06-28
Oh. So Ant should pretend he's not a talk show host.
1 Warack 2015-06-28
Being intolerant of others opinions, would be to block, try to get fired, or tell them to shut up. Arguing is literally tolerating the others opinion and trying to counter it
2 DoubleGuns 2015-06-28
No. Tolerating would be to just let other people's opinions be and to allow those people to have those opinions unchallenged. Trying to counter something is, by definition, not tolerant.
Ant is not tolerant of other people's views yet he tweets about he his views aren't tolerated. Either you're a blind Ant-follower who can't accept any hypocrisy on his part, or you're just not intelligent enough to grasp what basic words and actions mean. So, here you go, pay attention now...
tolerate
/ˈtɒləreɪt/
..."without interference" is the part I'm referring to in case you couldn't grasp that either.
1 panjshirlion 2015-06-28
That's absolutely not what tolerance means, particularly when it comes to tolerance of opinions. If a debate is held on a college campus, both opinions are being "tolerated" insofar as they are being permitted to make their case.
Or are you suggesting that whenever anyone attempts to persuade someone or engage in a discussion, they are being intolerant?
0 Warack 2015-06-28
Wait so having an opposing opinion is interfering with the initial opinion? If Ant was intolerant of other people's views he would interfere by shouting them down(O'Reilly style), trying to have them silenced, or blocking their views all together. If I tell you that "The one and true God will punish you for your sins." and you respond with "No, that isn't how that works" You aren't being intolerant, you are disagreeing. SJWs pull the intolerant card
15 DuckSpeaker_ 2015-06-28
I can't believe I used to think this guy was smart.
This might be the dumbest thing he's ever said, and you just know that he thinks it's a brilliant position.
"You don't tolerate my intolerance so nothing you say matters. #IMTHEPROBLEM2015"
3 dickkream_kumia 2015-06-28
what about that time he said no niggers in nasa
15 6jesus6christ6 2015-06-28
hahaha I remember when everyone on here used to go on about how intelligent and "well read" Ant is.
7 Clown_Shoe 2015-06-28
Anthony shows the true difference between knowledge and wisdom. Knowing how a lot of things work but no critical thinking and social skills.
6 truthie 2015-06-28
Ant never gave the impression he read anything. He had tons of TV knowledge, but no depth.
3 Spekk10 2015-06-28
"I know a little bit about [two] things"
1 holodog 2015-06-28
I just meant in terms of Guns N Ammo back issues.
15 somekindofsickjoke 2015-06-28
Anthony is a crushing bore. Why the fuck would anyone be following him on Twitter at this point?
15 maynardsabeast 2015-06-28
He's making a fool of himself.
12 Leeham721 2015-06-28
If you tolerate this then your children will be next, is what I've always said on this subject.
1 misfitlove 2015-06-28
Good reference
12 Dannyprecise 2015-06-28
He's reached a point where even I can't tolerate his nonsense. He's at the point where he's only arguing for the right wing talking points.
11 opesterthejokester 2015-06-28
He's really starting to annoy the fuck out of me now with this garbage.
1 climbon321 2015-06-28
Only now?
9 FukinPeckas 2015-06-28
"But they kept sayin' tolerate this, tolerate that, so I said yeah sure, why not?"
7 TacoTrots 2015-06-28
That "about a piece o' shit" old racist pedophile is a fucking barrel of laughs, aint he?
7 Muted_Post-Horn 2015-06-28
"Tolerate my intolerance or YOU'RE the real bigot!"
6 nolasen 2015-06-28
I'll repeat from an earlier post about much the same. an excerpt from a creative meeting at Casa de Cumia
""Is there some controversy here? Will this get the blogosphere a yappin? Will they put me on Hannity for this crazy tweet? Everything offends me/nothing offends me. This is an outrage. It's no big deal. Hello! Notice me! My income depends on it! I'll say anything!"
He's learning quick from cheesedick Gavin and in the process losing all the remaining shreds of authenticity.
PS: the Opester is still a cornball, legit retarded person too. "Hate" (or in my casethe dissapointment of watching the slow death of something once great) is not mutually exclusive.
3 fawkkyall 2015-06-28
"everything offends me/nothing offends me"
2 Pongkong 2015-06-28
what the actual fuck are you talking about? anthonys twitter hasnt changed in 6 years. he posts some pics of the tv show hes watching, then wars with lefties. i dont find comics on twitter funny anyway, so i dont give a shit what he does myself.
5 havingmadfun 2015-06-28
What the fuck is this creep even talking about anymore.
4 Mitchull 2015-06-28
/r/forwardsfromgrandma
4 mintwaltman 2015-06-28
and next they will come for your guns Anthony
1 paultownreddit 2015-06-28
lol stupid old white guy thinking the slippery slope is real :-)
1 climbon321 2015-06-28
That would be hilarious if they did.
4 [deleted] 2015-06-28
[deleted]
2 smelly- 2015-06-28
3edgy5me
1 opiesucks 2015-06-28
another spot on tweet from Sir Anthony Cumia. All ya'll a bunch of faggots.
7 KennethFresno 2015-06-28
Another unfunny tweet from Sir Anthony Cumia, faggot.
1 Mr_1990s 2015-06-28
You were probably on his lawn
1 apalehorse 2015-06-28
He's such an angsty teen.
-6 iris201 2015-06-28
This sub is filled with liberals now.
-7 TheDarkFezRises 2015-06-28
He's right.
2 [deleted] 2015-06-28
[deleted]
-7 mulatamongrol 2015-06-28
I'm not sure...but it seems that this sub apparently doesn't like Ant's political and social views. Better start another 10 posts all saying the same things to complain about a guy saying the same things.
6 packitchofsositch 2015-06-28
This one sounds drunker than usual. It looks like Bobo trying to do an Ant impersonation.
-9 FedoraTip9000 2015-06-28
Faggots getting butthurt. You guys new to the show?
6 Vargas_Larson 2015-06-28
Thanks for pointing that out. These noobs should know Ant gets butthurt over this faggotry endlessly.
2 Spokker 2015-06-28
Yeah, on the radio he should have always said, "I respect your opinion and we'll leave it at that" while dead air fills the airwaves.
The arguing and trying to prove someone wrong is what drives the discussions, whether it's on the radio or Twitter or whatever.
3 dickkream_kumia 2015-06-28
what about that time he said no niggers in nasa
1 Warack 2015-06-28
Being intolerant of others opinions, would be to block, try to get fired, or tell them to shut up. Arguing is literally tolerating the others opinion and trying to counter it
4 panjshirlion 2015-06-28
That's not really what intolerance means. Blocking people and calling them liberal fuckheads would be intolerance (which he also does, so you could have just gone with that).