This plus the half-assed witch hunt for the alleged jerking off thing. Jesus Christ they really do eat their own. Why would anyone pander to an audience that's just waiting for an opportunity to fuck you over?

Because retards like the OP give clickbait articles traffic, encouraging them to print more garbage like this. Stop reading it and the market value for being an outraged politically über correct nazi will diminish.

Sadly, yes people are just waiting for the opportunity to fuck over others. It's really troubling that "gotcha" things like this get far more attention than real issues that impact people's lives.

I just watched that clip, it was pretty mild. People get offended really easily.

I haven't seen any outrage over it.

I saw it on Good Morning America but the total "outrage" the story showcased was two tweets from random people.

How the fuck is that news. It replaces the man on the streets take on things, but it still shouldn't be news.

My thoughts exactly. If it was a tweet from the head of an organization that advocates for/provides support for victims of child sex abuse, it might have some merit as a news item; but the two tweets in the Good Morning America story were from two completely random people. It is quite peculiar that both ABC and CNN would have a story ready to go at 8AM eastern on Sunday morning about something that happened on a comedy show about 11:40PM eastern on a Saturday night.

This is making me think of why Patrice said he didn't want to be this indebted to "The Beast," have this level of fame.

"They give you a level of fame that is unreasonable. They give you all this fortune and fame, and then they come knocking. 'The bill on your fortune and fame is due. You owe now.' "

Louis CK is gonna be the spokesman for "anti-rape culture" if they even let him have a career after this. He's getting Tracey Morgan'd. He owes some people something.

Who gives a shit. It's Twitter. You could find two or three pissed off tweets on how the season finale of Big Brother #92 "went too far" if you really wanted to. The reporter could've easily had half the story written before the episode aired, then filled in the blanks with the specific jokes, pro/anti tweets, etc. Yawn.

Point is that "main stream media" has picked up two stories and they are shaping the story the way they want it.

Meh, what else is new. The same thing happened when Martin Lawrence hosted in the mid-90s, and he still does just fine.

Now the whole allegedly jerks off in front of non-consensual women thing on the other hand, that'll be a little trickier to overcome.

Noone's mad rube, it's outrage culture outrage culture. BREAD AND CIRCUS I SAY! And your buying into it, paying people who should be killed. Along with anyone who still listens to Opie n Jim. Why am I here? * EDIT I ADDED A COMA.

That goddamned outrage culture outrage culture. It's all I read about every time I go get the papers get the papers.

Because you're a bored shithead.

If anything you should have edited to spell "you're" correctly.

I wish you had added a comma and went into a coma.

[deleted]

[deleted]

as usual no outrage found,only from the loser posters of the outrage stories.

Remember when Chris Rock mentioned 9/11 on SNL a couple of years ago and there was "outrage"?

It's quite curious that Louis would choose to make jokes about unwanted sexual activities the same week that Gawker published an article about sexual misconduct allegations against Louis.

I'm not in any way condemning Louis' joke in the SNL monologue or giving legitimacy to the allegations raised by Gawker; I'm simply saying from a public relations standpoint that the backlash about the SNL joke has the potential to cause the allegations raised in the Gawker article to receive greater visibility in the mainstream media which is not good.

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]