"JOAN RIVERS USED A SLUR AGAINST SOMEONE! LETS JUMP THAT OLD UGLY STUPID CUNT"
That's using slurs directly off of the Gawker article comments by the way. Those people like to shit in their hands, throw it at someone, and then complain that a person is walking around covered in shit.
The hypocrisy in the outrage industry is fucking staggering.
Let's pretend that it's not just you wanting Ant to have taken creep shots (whatever they are).
Let's pretend that you don't need to have Ant be the villain so you can dismiss the woman's violence and racial slurs and therefor invalidate Ant's anger.
Let's pretend that you somehow magically know what Ant's motives were.
Sorry my post does not fit YOUR narrative of what you want to believe happened. So what motives did Ant have for posting that pic of her that night since you seem to know? Why didn't he tweet the photos above instead of tweeting that girl from behind? Let's stop pretending Ant had some higher purpose with his photography. She's hot and he took a photo. It's not complicated.
Google "street photography" and look at the image results. That specific photo is pretty standard street photography, and there are even more "creepy" shots on that image result from known photographers.
I don't understand how the gray dress woman was even a creepy shot - it was a full body picture that wasn't zoomed in on anything in particular. If all you saw was ass in that picture then that's on you.
Yeah people are also acting like Ant is a total idiot and has no ability to only release the things that support his story. It's not impossible or irrefutable that he was taking creep shots just because he released these 7 pics plus the other one of the girl behind and 2 of the original photos. Hypothetically if he was being a creep obviously he wouldn't release more photos that would indicate such.
Considering how the media that covered the rant convicted him of being out for the sole purpose of shooting pics up women's skirts I'd say it's relevant.
He took photos that had women's entire body in them. If you directly focus on her ass it's saying more about you the viewer than it is saying about the photographer.
Unless she's on her knees spreading cheek and winking her brown button at you, there's more to that photo than her ass. That's also the one photo we've seen with a woman's ass in it at all.
Yeah like her legs and her waist. Get off your horse, any red blooded male knows why Ant took that photo of that girl and posted it that night instead of posting those other he took which he's only posting now to defend himself. It's damage control.
I'm sure that's why he took that picture of the naked Erock look alike too.
and the homeless guy.
When you look at the photoset as a whole, it really looks like he was just taking pictures of the riff raff on the streets of NYC at night. Construction, homeless, dirty water dog vendors, and prostitutes.
You have to actually ignore the entire photoset to push the "HE WAS CREEPSHOTING" narrative and the fact that people do that willingly is really disappointing.
I wish you were capable of seeing the irony of your "high horse" comment while you go completely out of the way of evidence and logic to look down on and judge Ant.
I never said he was only taking creep shots. I'm just countering this other narrative he wasn't looking to take pics of scantily clad women that night either. That's not true either. I mean did you really buy it when Ant spun it as that lady jumped into his shot of the scenery? Let's be real, she WAS the subject of his photo. But did that justify an attack? No.
I don't remember Ant ever saying she "jumped" into the shot. I remember his argument that she was just in frame of the shot. Like the other 11 or 12 people in his other pictures.
Yeah, a couple of the pics, including the one of the woman from behind, are actually pretty decent. I'm assuming this is why people buy expensive lenses though, because it does a bit of the work for you.
So he was with Sam when this happened? Hopefully these assholes allow him to talk about what happened on air if he was there to see it. Otherwise? Completely fuck Siriusxm in the ass. Actually, fuck them in the ass anyway. But especially if that is the case.
opie is for sure a better photographer, these look like the first pictures a 14 y/o took when her parents bought her a new digital SLR camera so she can take myspace photos.
"JOAN RIVERS USED A SLUR AGAINST SOMEONE! LETS JUMP THAT OLD UGLY STUPID CUNT"
That's using slurs directly off of the Gawker article comments by the way. Those people like to shit in their hands, throw it at someone, and then complain that a person is walking around covered in shit.
The hypocrisy in the outrage industry is fucking staggering.
41 comments
21 _TheConsumer_ 2014-07-08
Where are the people screaming, "Who takes a picture of a construction site at 3AM? - what a creep!"
Oh, that's right...it doesn't fit their narrative.
6 ThePittWolf 2014-07-08
They are gently fingering their bums until they can jump on the next outrage train.
1 weenus 2014-07-08
"JOAN RIVERS USED A SLUR AGAINST SOMEONE! LETS JUMP THAT OLD UGLY STUPID CUNT"
That's using slurs directly off of the Gawker article comments by the way. Those people like to shit in their hands, throw it at someone, and then complain that a person is walking around covered in shit.
The hypocrisy in the outrage industry is fucking staggering.
6 Openy 2014-07-08
He's going to jerk off to the fat bikini guy pictures
7 weenus 2014-07-08
Erock, comment?
-1 serget 2014-07-08
He took a lot of shots that night but let's not pretend he didn't take some creep shots as well. Where is that pic of the chick with the nice ass at?
10 rumpumpumpum 2014-07-08
Let's pretend that it's not just you wanting Ant to have taken creep shots (whatever they are).
Let's pretend that you don't need to have Ant be the villain so you can dismiss the woman's violence and racial slurs and therefor invalidate Ant's anger.
Let's pretend that you somehow magically know what Ant's motives were.
3 serget 2014-07-08
Sorry my post does not fit YOUR narrative of what you want to believe happened. So what motives did Ant have for posting that pic of her that night since you seem to know? Why didn't he tweet the photos above instead of tweeting that girl from behind? Let's stop pretending Ant had some higher purpose with his photography. She's hot and he took a photo. It's not complicated.
0 rumpumpumpum 2014-07-08
I seem to know?! Do I really?!
1 OhDara 2014-07-08
Wasn't he talking about taking pictures of women through their windows?
1 rumpumpumpum 2014-07-08
I don't know. Was he, parody account #75834?
2 OhDara 2014-07-08
Lucky number 75834!!
1 weenus 2014-07-08
Google "street photography" and look at the image results. That specific photo is pretty standard street photography, and there are even more "creepy" shots on that image result from known photographers.
1 mikelp1973 2014-07-08
Pretty sure the only pictures you are not allowed to take are of bridges. People are fair game. Some people, well.
1 schabadoo 2014-07-08
Where is the ass shot?
-3 iaknet 2014-07-08
To be fair, if Ant had these pictures on hand, he probably should have posted more than just the one that looked like a creep shot.
2 qxzv 2014-07-08
I don't understand how the gray dress woman was even a creepy shot - it was a full body picture that wasn't zoomed in on anything in particular. If all you saw was ass in that picture then that's on you.
7 captainpissclams 2014-07-08
"Here's some stuff he did that isn't what got him into a shitty situation. It's relevant, I promise."
3 vincentgallosdick 2014-07-08
Yeah people are also acting like Ant is a total idiot and has no ability to only release the things that support his story. It's not impossible or irrefutable that he was taking creep shots just because he released these 7 pics plus the other one of the girl behind and 2 of the original photos. Hypothetically if he was being a creep obviously he wouldn't release more photos that would indicate such.
0 weenus 2014-07-08
Considering how the media that covered the rant convicted him of being out for the sole purpose of shooting pics up women's skirts I'd say it's relevant.
3 captainpissclams 2014-07-08
He took some photos that weren't of girl's asses. Great. He also did take photos of girl's asses. I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
2 weenus 2014-07-08
He took photos that had women's entire body in them. If you directly focus on her ass it's saying more about you the viewer than it is saying about the photographer.
Unless she's on her knees spreading cheek and winking her brown button at you, there's more to that photo than her ass. That's also the one photo we've seen with a woman's ass in it at all.
1 serget 2014-07-08
Yeah like her legs and her waist. Get off your horse, any red blooded male knows why Ant took that photo of that girl and posted it that night instead of posting those other he took which he's only posting now to defend himself. It's damage control.
4 weenus 2014-07-08
I'm sure that's why he took that picture of the naked Erock look alike too.
and the homeless guy.
When you look at the photoset as a whole, it really looks like he was just taking pictures of the riff raff on the streets of NYC at night. Construction, homeless, dirty water dog vendors, and prostitutes.
You have to actually ignore the entire photoset to push the "HE WAS CREEPSHOTING" narrative and the fact that people do that willingly is really disappointing.
I wish you were capable of seeing the irony of your "high horse" comment while you go completely out of the way of evidence and logic to look down on and judge Ant.
0 serget 2014-07-08
I never said he was only taking creep shots. I'm just countering this other narrative he wasn't looking to take pics of scantily clad women that night either. That's not true either. I mean did you really buy it when Ant spun it as that lady jumped into his shot of the scenery? Let's be real, she WAS the subject of his photo. But did that justify an attack? No.
1 weenus 2014-07-08
I don't remember Ant ever saying she "jumped" into the shot. I remember his argument that she was just in frame of the shot. Like the other 11 or 12 people in his other pictures.
0 TriangleDimes 2014-07-08
Look, if we know anything about Anthony Cumia, it's that he wouldn't have a black person in his camera unless it was an accident.
5 schabadoo 2014-07-08
Odd how this one missed the group of pics.
3 Opprobriousness 2014-07-08
Gives me the creeps!
3 VeritablyClean 2014-07-08
damn Ant has a great camera
1 weenus 2014-07-08
Yeah, a couple of the pics, including the one of the woman from behind, are actually pretty decent. I'm assuming this is why people buy expensive lenses though, because it does a bit of the work for you.
2 whileoneequalsone 2014-07-08
It really does. The 70-200 mk ii IS is a money maker.
3 dirtfarmingcanuck 2014-07-08
Is that.....Sam?
2 datmohtingting 2014-07-08
Where is the one of times square and another of some whore from behind?
2 Krucius 2014-07-08
These are all fap worthy.
2 harriswill 2014-07-08
Yeah but what you don't see is that these were taken with a 50 Caliber Assault Drone
1 waterbuffaler 2014-07-08
So he was with Sam when this happened? Hopefully these assholes allow him to talk about what happened on air if he was there to see it. Otherwise? Completely fuck Siriusxm in the ass. Actually, fuck them in the ass anyway. But especially if that is the case.
1 janedoe2893 2014-07-08
Is that Sam?
1 Chip--Chipperson 2014-07-08
Million dollar shots I say!
1 ImaBottom 2014-07-08
These are some awful photographs. Now I'm glad he got punched.
0 Gator1010 2014-07-08
Al you reak of shit. Get a job al! I was gonna help you out but i just realized i have nothing in common with you.
-3 CUNTYMOM 2014-07-08
opie is for sure a better photographer, these look like the first pictures a 14 y/o took when her parents bought her a new digital SLR camera so she can take myspace photos.
1 weenus 2014-07-08
"JOAN RIVERS USED A SLUR AGAINST SOMEONE! LETS JUMP THAT OLD UGLY STUPID CUNT"
That's using slurs directly off of the Gawker article comments by the way. Those people like to shit in their hands, throw it at someone, and then complain that a person is walking around covered in shit.
The hypocrisy in the outrage industry is fucking staggering.