Gawker "journalists" are paid via page views which is why they post the most inflammatory stuff imaginable. They want you to get mad. They want you to go to the comments and post antagonizing stuff. They want others to respond and write in response more inflammatory stuff. They want all of you to refresh the page and bring up the page view counts,. Read this:
Photos can be posted in the comments for fucks sake. We can affect the entirety of the site's page views if we fill up the comments with horrendous pictures.
And all that will happen is that Nick Denton will give this guy a raise for all the views he brings in. You thickheaded idiots just don't get it. The reason the Seinfeld guy was fired was because he made Gawker look stupid. If you can do that......sure you can get this guy fired. People that bring in pageviews though always stay. Always.
Not that Seinfeld guy. There was a "journalist" on Gawker who wrote an article about how Seinfeld was a racist due to his comments about diversity in comedy. He brought views to Gawker but he also brought bad press when people got angered by the article and....here is the important part other news organizations were reporting on the outrage towards Gawker. Gawker was looking bad to the mainstream. This is the line where a "journalist" from Gawker needs to cross to get fired. From what I remember, this woman was shortly fired from Gawker after this interview happened:
14 comments
10 Antoby 2014-07-07
Hey you guys. Congrats on giving them page views. This is exactly what they want.
9 janedoe2893 2014-07-07
Don't give the cunt any hits.
6 Higher_Primate 2014-07-07
Don't give them pageviews. Use imgur or pastebin
-3 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
How are you going to leave shitty comments on their articles?
We don't give a shit about the content in them.
9 Antoby 2014-07-07
Gawker "journalists" are paid via page views which is why they post the most inflammatory stuff imaginable. They want you to get mad. They want you to go to the comments and post antagonizing stuff. They want others to respond and write in response more inflammatory stuff. They want all of you to refresh the page and bring up the page view counts,. Read this:
http://upstart.bizjournals.com/views/blogs/market-movers/2008/03/21/blogonomics-gawkers-payroll-redux.html
You guys are making things worse when you do this.
-5 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
Photos can be posted in the comments for fucks sake. We can affect the entirety of the site's page views if we fill up the comments with horrendous pictures.
5 Antoby 2014-07-07
And all that will happen is that Nick Denton will give this guy a raise for all the views he brings in. You thickheaded idiots just don't get it. The reason the Seinfeld guy was fired was because he made Gawker look stupid. If you can do that......sure you can get this guy fired. People that bring in pageviews though always stay. Always.
-2 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
Did you take your medication this morning?
3 Antoby 2014-07-07
What did I say was wrong or is this the part of the debate where we just trade nothing but insults back and forth?
-3 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
How did Michael Richards make Gawker look stupid.
4 Antoby 2014-07-07
Not that Seinfeld guy. There was a "journalist" on Gawker who wrote an article about how Seinfeld was a racist due to his comments about diversity in comedy. He brought views to Gawker but he also brought bad press when people got angered by the article and....here is the important part other news organizations were reporting on the outrage towards Gawker. Gawker was looking bad to the mainstream. This is the line where a "journalist" from Gawker needs to cross to get fired. From what I remember, this woman was shortly fired from Gawker after this interview happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-avakrRUaU
-1 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
Wow, didn't know about this.
Carry on.
2 [deleted] 2014-07-07
[deleted]
-3 LizardKingRumsfeld 2014-07-07
Yeah, it's appropriate it use that article to support Ant.
9 EVILTHE_TURTLE 2014-07-07
You got it.
1 [deleted] 2014-07-07
[deleted]
0 [deleted] 2014-07-07
[deleted]