After O&A conspiracy theory's.

1  2013-04-30 by [deleted]

So I was all Troy on this one.

Only thing is when Sam asked why should they do this to benefit the country he wasn't able to answer.

From what I know about this theory (joe rogan experience) the pentagon reported a 3 trillion loss in money. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJOkdZTHP7Q

It is also alleged that the part of the pentagon that was hit was the accounting part.

Discuss or some shit you assholes. I often think that Sam, Anthony, and Jimmy are very dismissive of government wrongings and all research they look up is very old and new developments have been released.

2 comments

2  Its_Just_a_Ridee 2013-04-30

While they were talking this exact point was going through my head. I was listening to it on like a 3 hour delay so I couldn't call in. I've heard the same thing but who knows how true it is. After getting out of college and cutting back on my drug use, I really don't believe in these conspiracies anymore. There are obviously some things that are wrong, but I def believe the overall story. Also, the fact that the people who believe in the 9-11 conspiracies also believe in chem trails and Alex jones, I find it hard to take anything like that seriously.

1  thecrazing 2013-04-30

Except, that part about the $2.3 trillion has been extremely warped over the days after 9/11 and the years of simmering in conspiracy pressure cookers.

On 9/10, Rumsfeld was complaining about bloated, outdated bureaucracies.

The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible.

http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=430

Joe Rogan's entertaining, and if as a listener you can agree with his premises he can sometimes even be thought provoking, but he's not an information source.