You never see photos of Fatrick and his kid
56 2019-04-24 by Bakersfield__Chimp
Only the worst fathers get denied any sort of custody. We can only assume something awful, possibly sexual abuse, is in Fatrick's past.
56 2019-04-24 by Bakersfield__Chimp
Only the worst fathers get denied any sort of custody. We can only assume something awful, possibly sexual abuse, is in Fatrick's past.
24 comments
1 TheGhostOfAbeVigoda 2019-04-24
It's either that or it's not even his kid.
1 OutlawMemer 2019-04-24
The lovely and protective mother must've decided the child needed to be with the REAL father who can provide for a family and bruise her cervix nightly.
1 SuperTubsPeterson 2019-04-24
A good woman
1 OutlawMemer 2019-04-24
A queen.
1 Antlovessue 2019-04-24
I'm pretty sure it's not his kid and he fucked it
1 JoeCumiasFryingPan 2019-04-24
That sounds factually inaccurate
1 JoeCumiaDotCom 2019-04-24
I think the kid is made up. The dude is a complete psycho.
1 BobbyDrakeOmegaLVL 2019-04-24
Someone found child support complaints online from him failing to provide. This was back in the early days of discovering Patrick.
1 RoliMosimann 2019-04-24
I'm not too sure that's accurate, Wisconsin court records show orders for child support, and his record has none.
1 BobbyDrakeOmegaLVL 2019-04-24
Are you trying to say I was lied to?
1 billdipshitbellamy 2019-04-24
Those should be stickied. We need new material.
1 tooth_repair 2019-04-24
I spent almost a decade in the grips of horrific drug addiction and I still have almost 50/50 custody and full parental rights.
There are really only three possibilities, and I mean this in complete sincerity - I’m not trying to bash that fat faggot:
1) Kid truly honestly isn’t his AND never was (even if a paternity test showed he wasn’t the biological father, he would still have rights unless the child had a different acknowledged father before he even came around)
2) He actually did some truly horrific shit to the child or Mom that endangered them and he lost his rights
Or, most likely
3) He’s a deadbeat dad who is too self-obsessed to be a parent / signed away his parental rights.
The last one is easily the most faggotish and least masculine move so I’m sure that’s the truth
1 BlackManMoan 2019-04-24
How could he possibly have enough time to be with a child when he's parading around a "wife", brings his laptop to a bar for attention, or pays a load of money to "host" a panel at a convention where he feels people showed up to listen to his nonsense?
I think you're being a bit harsh. Being an insecure, pathological liar and blatant faggot is very hard to do at the same time.
1 fawwkyeah 2019-04-24
His ex wife probably cucked his retarded ass and convinced him to sign his rights away so she could restart her family somewhere else and he could be a faggot writer, probably telling him he could still be in the kids life
This is why I didn’t marry the girl I busted a nut inside of, you can’t trust whores
1 SensibleKeks 2019-04-24
If you sign away your parental rights, doesn't that mean you don't owe child support? I thought he was paying that. If true, then 1 and 3 are eliminated leaving the fact that he abused his kids as the only credible scenario.
1 RoliMosimann 2019-04-24
I'm pretty sure it's number one. He says she left him while she was pregnant, that's a red flag right there. There's no order for child support on his record, which there would be whether he was paying anything or not.
1 Jungies 2019-04-24
Didn't he also have a domestic violence conviction against his ex-wife on there?
There were two Patricks, and I can't remember which one it was.
1 RoliMosimann 2019-04-24
Fatrick is milquetoast. He's got his divorce and a couple traffic tickets on there, that's it.
1 D0WhatN0w 2019-04-24
They were confiscated by the FBI
1 JoeCumiasFryingPan 2019-04-24
And I never want to, child. That child has already been through enough, little one.
1 brightest_night 2019-04-24
Probably a court ordered reason.
1 SpitItoutSocratesxyz 2019-04-24
I have not heard any factual proof but I HAVE heard rumors. Does the fact that he's never denied it mean it's true? I don't know, i'm just asking the question.
1 Phantas_Magorical 2019-04-24
I can only assume when he had possession he kept him locked up a la Josef Fritzl. Only logical explanation.
1 YourOldPalHoward 2019-04-24
/u/patrickstomlinson comment?